Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8293050: RISC-V: Remove redundant non-null assertions about macro-assembler #10079

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

RealFYang
Copy link
Member

@RealFYang RealFYang commented Aug 30, 2022

There are some non-null assertions about macro-assembler in riscv-specific code. Most of them are there to make some internal code-check tools happy. We should remove those redundant assertions to make the code clean.

Tested with tier1 hotspot on linux-riscv64 unmatched.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8293050: RISC-V: Remove redundant non-null assertions about macro-assembler

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/10079/head:pull/10079
$ git checkout pull/10079

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/10079
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/10079/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 10079

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 10079

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10079.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Aug 30, 2022

👋 Welcome back fyang! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Aug 30, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 30, 2022

@RealFYang The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org label Aug 30, 2022
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Aug 30, 2022

Webrevs

@feilongjiang
Copy link
Member

Nice clean up! LGTM.

@RealFYang
Copy link
Member Author

@shipilev : Want to take a look? Thanks.

Copy link
Contributor

@yadongw yadongw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm(not a reviewer)

Copy link
Member

@shipilev shipilev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks okay, but I wonder if we want to do the fence change separately.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 31, 2022

@RealFYang This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8293050: RISC-V: Remove redundant non-null assertions about macro-assembler

Reviewed-by: fjiang, yadongwang, shade

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 20 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 4c90e87: 8290781: Segfault at PhaseIdealLoop::clone_loop_handle_data_uses
  • 9e3176b: 8293035: Cleanup MacroAssembler::movoop code patching logic aarch64 riscv
  • c42478b: 8293109: Remove unused methods in Compiler
  • d2eed07: 8293020: jmod should not be treated as "small" tool for large modules
  • 923c952: 8293098: GHA: Harmonize GCC version handling for host and cross builds
  • 38377d5: 8291649: multiple tests failing with -Xcomp after JDK-8290034
  • 2d7792c: 8293065: Zero build failure on AArch64 and RISCV64 after JDK-8293007
  • c3380c0: 8292995: improve the SA page cache
  • 1cf245d: 8292590: Product JVM crashes with FLAG_SET_XXX on non-product Flag
  • 6335150: 6205692: (spec) javax.crypto.MacSpi.engineUpdate(ByteBuffer input): NPE should be specified
  • ... and 10 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/b3450e930e52f03ffc3891de7672625ac45b13d0...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Aug 31, 2022
@RealFYang
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks all the review. I think it's safe to integrate then.
/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 31, 2022

Going to push as commit 38e6706.
Since your change was applied there have been 20 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 4c90e87: 8290781: Segfault at PhaseIdealLoop::clone_loop_handle_data_uses
  • 9e3176b: 8293035: Cleanup MacroAssembler::movoop code patching logic aarch64 riscv
  • c42478b: 8293109: Remove unused methods in Compiler
  • d2eed07: 8293020: jmod should not be treated as "small" tool for large modules
  • 923c952: 8293098: GHA: Harmonize GCC version handling for host and cross builds
  • 38377d5: 8291649: multiple tests failing with -Xcomp after JDK-8290034
  • 2d7792c: 8293065: Zero build failure on AArch64 and RISCV64 after JDK-8293007
  • c3380c0: 8292995: improve the SA page cache
  • 1cf245d: 8292590: Product JVM crashes with FLAG_SET_XXX on non-product Flag
  • 6335150: 6205692: (spec) javax.crypto.MacSpi.engineUpdate(ByteBuffer input): NPE should be specified
  • ... and 10 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/b3450e930e52f03ffc3891de7672625ac45b13d0...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Aug 31, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Aug 31, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Aug 31, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 31, 2022

@RealFYang Pushed as commit 38e6706.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@RealFYang RealFYang deleted the JDK-8293050 branch September 9, 2022 01:07
@RealFYang RealFYang restored the JDK-8293050 branch September 9, 2022 01:07
@RealFYang RealFYang deleted the JDK-8293050 branch September 9, 2022 01:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
4 participants