New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8293578: Duplicate ldc generated by javac #10272
Conversation
👋 Welcome back jlahoda! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
watch out for newline
@lahodaj This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 15 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
/integrate |
Going to push as commit 39cd163.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
Consider code like:
javac has a concept of types with attached constants (to support proper behavior of constant expressions). Normally, these constants are cleared as specific places. But, in the above case, the type of
testC
is actuallyClass<? extends String["incorrect"]>
, the constant then gets propagated, and eventually the type oftestV
isString["incorrect"]
, and the code generator will then replace reads fromtestV
with a ldc for the constant, so the code above prints "incorrect" instead of "correct".The solution is to invoke
.baseType()
to remove the constant value when constructing the synthetic.getClass()
's type (so the type oftestC
isClass<? extends String>
), and also a tweak tocheckLocalVarType
, as suggested in the bug.Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/10272/head:pull/10272
$ git checkout pull/10272
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/10272
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/10272/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 10272
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 10272
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10272.diff