Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8293964: Unused check_for_duplicates parameter in ClassLoaderExt::process_jar_manifest #10425

Closed

Conversation

matias9927
Copy link
Contributor

@matias9927 matias9927 commented Sep 26, 2022

The check_for_duplicates parameter in ClassLoaderExt::process_jar_manifest was removed due to it being unused. Ran tier1 to verify. Please review


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8293964: Unused check_for_duplicates parameter in ClassLoaderExt::process_jar_manifest

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/10425/head:pull/10425
$ git checkout pull/10425

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/10425
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/10425/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 10425

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 10425

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10425.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Sep 26, 2022

👋 Welcome back matias9927! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 26, 2022

@matias9927 The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-runtime

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-runtime hotspot-runtime-dev@openjdk.org label Sep 26, 2022
@matias9927 matias9927 marked this pull request as ready for review September 26, 2022 17:22
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Sep 26, 2022
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Sep 26, 2022

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@calvinccheung calvinccheung left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. Thanks.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 26, 2022

⚠️ @matias9927 the full name on your profile does not match the author name in this pull requests' HEAD commit. If this pull request gets integrated then the author name from this pull requests' HEAD commit will be used for the resulting commit. If you wish to push a new commit with a different author name, then please run the following commands in a local repository of your personal fork:

$ git checkout 8293964_checkForDuplicates
$ git commit --author='Preferred Full Name <you@example.com>' --allow-empty -m 'Update full name'
$ git push

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 26, 2022

@matias9927 This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8293964: Unused check_for_duplicates parameter in ClassLoaderExt::process_jar_manifest

Reviewed-by: ccheung, dholmes

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 22 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 3419363: 8294361: Cleanup usages of StringBuffer in SQLOutputImpl
  • 1abf971: 8249627: Degrade Thread.suspend and Thread.resume
  • bc12e95: 8292969: Bad Thread Utilization in ForkJoinPool
  • dd51f7e: 8293996: C2: fix and simplify IdealLoopTree::do_remove_empty_loop
  • 14c6ac4: 8293998: [PPC64] JfrGetCallTrace: assert(_pc != nullptr) failed: must have PC
  • 02ea338: 8293887: AArch64 build failure with GCC 12 due to maybe-uninitialized warning in libfdlibm k_rem_pio2.c
  • 49a7347: 8294408: Problemlist runtime/handshake/HandshakeSuspendExitTest.java
  • aa48705: 8289422: Fix and re-enable vector conditional move
  • 1ddc92f: 8294404: [BACKOUT] JDK-8294142: make test should report only executed tests
  • 1e222bc: 8293462: [macos] app image signature invalid when creating DMG or PKG from post processed signed image
  • ... and 12 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/543851db926469df57a8f4a2bd3458349012145f...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@calvinccheung, @dholmes-ora) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Sep 26, 2022
Copy link
Member

@dholmes-ora dholmes-ora left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. Thanks.

@matias9927
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Sep 27, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 27, 2022

@matias9927
Your change (at version 95167ef) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@calvinccheung
Copy link
Member

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 27, 2022

Going to push as commit 112ca2b.
Since your change was applied there have been 23 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 99017b0: 8293064: Remove unused NET_xxx functions
  • 3419363: 8294361: Cleanup usages of StringBuffer in SQLOutputImpl
  • 1abf971: 8249627: Degrade Thread.suspend and Thread.resume
  • bc12e95: 8292969: Bad Thread Utilization in ForkJoinPool
  • dd51f7e: 8293996: C2: fix and simplify IdealLoopTree::do_remove_empty_loop
  • 14c6ac4: 8293998: [PPC64] JfrGetCallTrace: assert(_pc != nullptr) failed: must have PC
  • 02ea338: 8293887: AArch64 build failure with GCC 12 due to maybe-uninitialized warning in libfdlibm k_rem_pio2.c
  • 49a7347: 8294408: Problemlist runtime/handshake/HandshakeSuspendExitTest.java
  • aa48705: 8289422: Fix and re-enable vector conditional move
  • 1ddc92f: 8294404: [BACKOUT] JDK-8294142: make test should report only executed tests
  • ... and 13 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/543851db926469df57a8f4a2bd3458349012145f...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Sep 27, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Sep 27, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels Sep 27, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 27, 2022

@calvinccheung @matias9927 Pushed as commit 112ca2b.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@matias9927 matias9927 deleted the 8293964_checkForDuplicates branch September 27, 2022 15:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-runtime hotspot-runtime-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
3 participants