Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8282463: javax/sound/sampled/Clip/DataPusherThreadCheck.java fails #10717

Closed

Conversation

turbanoff
Copy link
Member

@turbanoff turbanoff commented Oct 15, 2022

Test failed on Ubuntu, because both implementations of MixerProvider have no devices:

  1. com.sun.media.sound.DirectAudioDeviceProvider#nGetNumDevices returns 0
    DirectAudioDeviceProvider init
  2. com.sun.media.sound.PortMixerProvider#nGetNumDevices returns 0
    PortMixerProvider init

It leads to javax.sound.sampled.spi.MixerProvider#getMixerInfo returns empty array.
AudioSystem getMixedInfoList

And DataPusher thread is not created, because of AudioSystem.isLineSupported returns false in the method com.sun.media.sound.JavaSoundAudioClip#createSourceDataLine.
I propose to perform the same check in test code and skip it.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8282463: javax/sound/sampled/Clip/DataPusherThreadCheck.java fails

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/10717/head:pull/10717
$ git checkout pull/10717

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/10717
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/10717/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 10717

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 10717

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10717.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Oct 15, 2022

👋 Welcome back aturbanov! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Oct 15, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 15, 2022

@turbanoff The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • client

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the client client-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Oct 15, 2022
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Oct 15, 2022

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@prrace prrace left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So I have no real objection to this check because it will solve something - more on that at the end.

  1. On my Ubuntu 22.04 system it passes this new condition you added - ie the device is present.
  2. This test has been failing only very intermittently, which points to the failure mode in the test being that the DataPusher thread is created but is terminated before it can be observed.

Where I've seen the device not present is when running on some VM configs where there is no audio support - there the test will fail every time.
For that I think your check should cure the 100% failure, but will do nothing about the 1% (or less) failure.

That said .. the test doesn't call clip.stop() until after the verification, so perhaps there's something else going on.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 27, 2022

@turbanoff This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8282463: javax/sound/sampled/Clip/DataPusherThreadCheck.java fails

Reviewed-by: prr, serb

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 183 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • a44ebd5: 8295849: Consolidate Threads::owning_thread*
  • 1c86cf5: 8294672: Typo in description of JDWP VirtualMachine/AllThreads command
  • 823fd4a: 8293785: Add a jtreg test for TraceOptoParse
  • 754bd53: 8296030: compiler/c2/irTests/TestVectorizeTypeConversion.java fails with release VMs after JDK-8291781
  • 1fdbb1b: 8295926: RISC-V: C1: Fix LIRGenerator::do_LibmIntrinsic
  • cf5546b: 8291336: Add ideal rule to convert floating point multiply by 2 into addition
  • 4b89fce: 8291781: assert(!is_visited) failed: visit only once with -XX:+SuperWordRTDepCheck
  • d5d3424: 8295405: Add cause in a couple of IllegalArgumentException and InvalidParameterException shown by sun/security/pkcs11 tests
  • fd668dc: 8295537: Enhance TRACE_METHOD_LINKAGE to show the target MethodHandle
  • 182c215: 8295994: Remove left over InetAddressContainer class
  • ... and 173 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/2087424736f15a5a80a0492993a6cd74da87188a...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Oct 27, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@prrace prrace left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I remain un-convinced this has got to the bottom of the original reason for the bug but OK to push this and see what happens.

@turbanoff
Copy link
Member Author

I wasn't able to reproduce failure after the fix.

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 30, 2022

Going to push as commit 2e71637.
Since your change was applied there have been 185 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • f3ca0ca: 8293999: [JVMCI] need support for aligned constants in generated code larger than 8 bytes
  • 8aa1526: 8285835: SIGSEGV in PhaseIdealLoop::build_loop_late_post_work
  • a44ebd5: 8295849: Consolidate Threads::owning_thread*
  • 1c86cf5: 8294672: Typo in description of JDWP VirtualMachine/AllThreads command
  • 823fd4a: 8293785: Add a jtreg test for TraceOptoParse
  • 754bd53: 8296030: compiler/c2/irTests/TestVectorizeTypeConversion.java fails with release VMs after JDK-8291781
  • 1fdbb1b: 8295926: RISC-V: C1: Fix LIRGenerator::do_LibmIntrinsic
  • cf5546b: 8291336: Add ideal rule to convert floating point multiply by 2 into addition
  • 4b89fce: 8291781: assert(!is_visited) failed: visit only once with -XX:+SuperWordRTDepCheck
  • d5d3424: 8295405: Add cause in a couple of IllegalArgumentException and InvalidParameterException shown by sun/security/pkcs11 tests
  • ... and 175 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/2087424736f15a5a80a0492993a6cd74da87188a...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Oct 30, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Oct 30, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Oct 30, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 30, 2022

@turbanoff Pushed as commit 2e71637.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
client client-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
3 participants