Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8295469: S390X: Optimized builds are broken #10743

Closed

Conversation

shipilev
Copy link
Member

@shipilev shipilev commented Oct 18, 2022

* For target hotspot_variant-server_libjvm_objs_BUILD_LIBJVM_link:
/usr/lib/gcc-cross/s390x-linux-gnu/10/../../../../s390x-linux-gnu/bin/ld: /home/shade/trunks/jdk/build/build-all-server-optimized-s390x-linux-gnu-10/hotspot/variant-server/libjvm/objs/interp_masm_s390.o: in function `InterpreterMacroAssembler::get_monitors(RegisterImpl*)':
make/hotspot/src/hotspot/cpu/s390/interp_masm_s390.cpp:673: undefined reference to `InterpreterMacroAssembler::asm_assert_ijava_state_magic(RegisterImpl*)'
/usr/lib/gcc-cross/s390x-linux-gnu/10/../../../../s390x-linux-gnu/bin/ld: /home/shade/trunks/jdk/build/build-all-server-optimized-s390x-linux-gnu-10/hotspot/variant-server/libjvm/objs/interp_masm_s390.o: in function `InterpreterMacroAssembler::save_bcp()':
make/hotspot/src/hotspot/cpu/s390/interp_masm_s390.cpp:654: undefined reference to `InterpreterMacroAssembler::asm_assert_ijava_state_magic(RegisterImpl*)'

The fix is to enable assert-like methods only in "debug" builds, and allow diag-like printing methods in "optimized" builds.

Additional testing:

  • Linux S390X {server, client, minimal, zero} x {release, fastdebug, slowdebug, optimized} make hotspot

Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/10743/head:pull/10743
$ git checkout pull/10743

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/10743
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/10743/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 10743

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 10743

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10743.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Oct 18, 2022

👋 Welcome back shade! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Oct 18, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 18, 2022

@shipilev The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org label Oct 18, 2022
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Oct 18, 2022

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@tstuefe tstuefe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1, trivial. Thanks for fixing.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 18, 2022

@shipilev This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8295469: S390X: Optimized builds are broken

Reviewed-by: stuefe

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 1 new commit pushed to the master branch:

  • 8c40b7d: 8292177: InitialSecurityProperty JFR event

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Oct 18, 2022
@shipilev
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks!

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 18, 2022

Going to push as commit 7b2e83b.
Since your change was applied there have been 5 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 63867c4: 8295433: EpsilonHeap doesn't need to override post_initialize()
  • e7375f9: 8295468: RISC-V: Minimal builds are broken
  • bd41428: 8293590: Some syntax checks performed by URL.openConnection() could be performed earlier, at URL construction
  • 78fed9d: 7175397: The divider color is not changed to green when dragging for Nimbus LaF.
  • 8c40b7d: 8292177: InitialSecurityProperty JFR event

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Oct 18, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Oct 18, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Oct 18, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 18, 2022

@shipilev Pushed as commit 7b2e83b.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@shipilev shipilev deleted the JDK-8295469-s390x-optimized branch October 21, 2022 09:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
2 participants