Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8295823: Use enhanced-for cycle instead of Enumeration in java.naming #10804

Conversation

turbanoff
Copy link
Member

@turbanoff turbanoff commented Oct 20, 2022

java.util.Enumeration is a legacy interface from java 1.0.
There are couple of cycles which use it to iterate over collections. We can replace this manual cycle with enchanced-for, which is shorter and easier to read.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8295823: Use enhanced-for cycle instead of Enumeration in java.naming

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/10804/head:pull/10804
$ git checkout pull/10804

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/10804
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/10804/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 10804

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 10804

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10804.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Oct 20, 2022

👋 Welcome back aturbanov! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 20, 2022

@turbanoff The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Oct 20, 2022
@turbanoff turbanoff changed the title [PATCH] Use enhanced-for cycle instead of Enumeration in java.naming 8295823: Use enhanced-for cycle instead of Enumeration in java.naming Oct 24, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Oct 24, 2022
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Oct 24, 2022

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@AlekseiEfimov AlekseiEfimov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi Andrey,

The changes look reasonable to me.
The JNDI tests (JCK/regression) are also happy with it.

Copy link
Member

@dfuch dfuch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 24, 2022

@turbanoff This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8295823: Use enhanced-for cycle instead of Enumeration in java.naming

Reviewed-by: aefimov, dfuchs, vtewari

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 42 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Oct 24, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@vyommani vyommani left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks OK to me.

@turbanoff
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 26, 2022

Going to push as commit 46e6aee.
Since your change was applied there have been 70 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Oct 26, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Oct 26, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Oct 26, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 26, 2022

@turbanoff Pushed as commit 46e6aee.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@turbanoff turbanoff deleted the enhanced-for_instead_of_Enumeration_in_java.naming branch October 27, 2022 18:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
4 participants