Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8296083: javax/swing/JTree/6263446/bug6263446.java fails intermittently on a VM #11057

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

prsadhuk
Copy link
Contributor

@prsadhuk prsadhuk commented Nov 9, 2022

Test intermittently fails in VM citing "Tree is not editing". Seems to be problem with mouse clicks not getting registered properly..
Similar test test/jdk/javax/swing/JTable/6263446/bug6263446.java is not affected, so made the test similar to it by using same safeguard using Robot.waitForIdle() and modifying clickpoint to tree cell midpoint.

Several iterations of the test pass in the OCI VM and all other physical platforms (link in JBS)


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8296083: javax/swing/JTree/6263446/bug6263446.java fails intermittently on a VM

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/11057/head:pull/11057
$ git checkout pull/11057

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/11057
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/11057/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 11057

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 11057

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11057.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Nov 9, 2022

👋 Welcome back psadhukhan! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Nov 9, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 9, 2022

@prsadhuk The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • client

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the client client-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Nov 9, 2022
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Nov 9, 2022

Webrevs

@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@

public class bug6263446 {

private static final String FIRST = "AAAAAAAAAAA";
private static final String FIRST = "AAAAA";
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

any particular reason for decreasing length of string?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, as I mentioned to make it same like JTable/6263446/bug6263446.java which has not failed in these OCI systems at all as the cause of this test failure in OCI system was not making any sense but in my local ubutu20.04 system ,it fails once in a while for not able to select the string which is done in the testcase by mouse clicks, so more characters can result in failure in selection if mouse clicks is not getting registered properly...
Reducing characters does not hamper testcase which can still be used to test JDK-6263446 regression

@prrace
Copy link
Contributor

prrace commented Nov 14, 2022

So it now passes 100% of the time on the OCI systems ?

@prsadhuk
Copy link
Contributor Author

So it now passes 100% of the time on the OCI systems ?

At least in my testing, links of those OCI jobs have been put in JBS too

@prsadhuk
Copy link
Contributor Author

Just to reiterate, I am not sure why it is failing in OCI systems as I am not able to reproduce in OCI...one time I reproduce it is bcoz of screen lock...So I added this stability checks and made it similar to JTable/6263446.java which results it in passing in OCI in several CI jobs that I gave (link in JBS)...I think we should probably give this stability fixes it a try

Copy link
Contributor

@prrace prrace left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This test will need to be monitored

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 16, 2022

@prsadhuk This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8296083: javax/swing/JTree/6263446/bug6263446.java fails intermittently on a VM

Reviewed-by: tr, prr

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 103 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 39dda24: 8157173: [macosx] java/awt/Robot/ModifierRobotKey/ModifierRobotKeyTest.java fails
  • 51f690d: 8297134: Add a @sealedGraph tag to InetAddress
  • 3eb6d0e: 8291991: Adjust the "shared class paths mismatch" message if class path logging is enabled
  • eac26f4: 8296709: WARNING: JNI call made without checking exceptions
  • 4946737: 8297047: IGV: graphContent not set when opening a new tab
  • 8b1ff9e: 8297132: BACKOUT JDK-8296889: Race condition when cancelling a request
  • e72b0ac: 8296429: Remove os::supports_sse
  • 813b223: 8296926: Sort include lines of files in the include/ directory
  • 8cdcec4: 8296774: Removed default MEMFLAGS value from CHeapBitMap
  • c3b285a: 8296916: RISC-V: Move some small macro-assembler functions to header file
  • ... and 93 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/fef68bbaf6de7e0d4be311a5f3648c16548c5b4d...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Nov 16, 2022
@prsadhuk
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 17, 2022

Going to push as commit dd9aa72.
Since your change was applied there have been 117 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • cc44419: 8295407: C2 crash: Error: ShouldNotReachHere() in multiple vector tests with -XX:-MonomorphicArrayCheck -XX:-UncommonNullCast
  • e2269fd: 8296968: Update langtools tests to use @enablePreview
  • 2159170: 8296453: Simplify resource_area uses in ClassPathDirEntry::open_stream
  • 95c390e: 8296956: [JVMCI] HotSpotResolvedJavaFieldImpl.getIndex returns wrong value
  • 68d3ed5: 8296442: EncryptedPrivateKeyInfo can be created with an uninitialized AlgorithmParameters
  • 37848a9: 8296967: [JVMCI] rationalize relationship between getCodeSize and getCode in ResolvedJavaMethod
  • b3ef337: 8296960: [JVMCI] list HotSpotConstantPool.loadReferencedType to ConstantPool
  • f0474b8: 8283238: make/scripts/compare.sh should show the diff when classlist does not match
  • 04a4d34: 8297006: JFR: AbstractEventStream should not hold thread instance
  • 5db1b58: 8296961: [JVMCI] Access to j.l.r.Method/Constructor/Field for ResolvedJavaMethod/ResolvedJavaField
  • ... and 107 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/fef68bbaf6de7e0d4be311a5f3648c16548c5b4d...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Nov 17, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Nov 17, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Nov 17, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 17, 2022

@prsadhuk Pushed as commit dd9aa72.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@prsadhuk prsadhuk deleted the JDK-8296083 branch November 17, 2022 03:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
client client-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
6 participants