Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

JDK-8290845: Consider an alternative item separator for multi-item option values #11178

Conversation

jonathan-gibbons
Copy link
Contributor

@jonathan-gibbons jonathan-gibbons commented Nov 15, 2022

Please review a medium simple update to prefer the use of comma (,) instead of colon (:) in certain options taking a list of values. Options taking a search path (like --class-path, --source-path, etc) are not affected.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change requires a CSR request to be approved

Issues

  • JDK-8290845: Consider an alternative item separator for multi-item option values
  • JDK-8295858: Consider an alternative item separator for multi-item option values (CSR)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/11178/head:pull/11178
$ git checkout pull/11178

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/11178
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/11178/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 11178

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 11178

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11178.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Nov 15, 2022

👋 Welcome back jjg! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Nov 15, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 15, 2022

@jonathan-gibbons The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • javadoc

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the javadoc javadoc-dev@openjdk.org label Nov 15, 2022
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Nov 15, 2022

Webrevs

…parator # Please enter a commit message to explain why this merge is necessary, # especially if it

merges an updated upstream into a topic branch. # # Lines starting with '#' will be ignored, and an empty message aborts # the commit.
*/
private List<String> tokenize(String s, char separator, int maxTokens) {
private List<String> tokenize(String s, int maxTokens) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not saying that we should do anything about it, but I would be surprised if there were no such tokenization functionality in the JDK API.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

None of the JDK simple tokenizers supports handling of escape characters.
But a Pattern/Matcher could be used.

Copy link
Member

@pavelrappo pavelrappo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 18, 2022

@jonathan-gibbons This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8290845: Consider an alternative item separator for multi-item option values

Reviewed-by: prappo

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 4 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • c56c69e: 8285604: closed sun/java2d/GdiRendering/ClipShapeRendering.java failed with "Incorrect color ffeeeeee instead of ff0000ff in pixel (100, 100)"
  • 6fd1442: 8296743: Tighten Class.getModifiers spec for array classes
  • 3a15e84: 8297258: Typo in java -help referencing -disable-@files instead of --disable-@files
  • 43ce047: 8178698: javax/sound/midi/Sequencer/MetaCallback.java failed with timeout

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Nov 18, 2022
@jonathan-gibbons
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 18, 2022

Going to push as commit 52494df.
Since your change was applied there have been 4 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • c56c69e: 8285604: closed sun/java2d/GdiRendering/ClipShapeRendering.java failed with "Incorrect color ffeeeeee instead of ff0000ff in pixel (100, 100)"
  • 6fd1442: 8296743: Tighten Class.getModifiers spec for array classes
  • 3a15e84: 8297258: Typo in java -help referencing -disable-@files instead of --disable-@files
  • 43ce047: 8178698: javax/sound/midi/Sequencer/MetaCallback.java failed with timeout

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Nov 18, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Nov 18, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Nov 18, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 18, 2022

@jonathan-gibbons Pushed as commit 52494df.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@jonathan-gibbons jonathan-gibbons deleted the 8290845.option-separator branch November 18, 2022 22:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
integrated Pull request has been integrated javadoc javadoc-dev@openjdk.org
4 participants