Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8297349: Parallel: Use correct claim value for CLD oop iteration in PSScavengeCLDClosure #11270

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

albertnetymk
Copy link
Member

@albertnetymk albertnetymk commented Nov 21, 2022

Simple type fix without affecting the actual value passed.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8297349: Parallel: Use correct claim value for CLD oop iteration in PSScavengeCLDClosure

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/11270/head:pull/11270
$ git checkout pull/11270

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/11270
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/11270/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 11270

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 11270

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11270.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Nov 21, 2022

👋 Welcome back ayang! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title 8297349 8297349: Parallel: Use correct claim value for CLD oop iteration in PSScavengeCLDClosure Nov 21, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Nov 21, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 21, 2022

@albertnetymk The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-gc

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-gc hotspot-gc-dev@openjdk.org label Nov 21, 2022
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Nov 21, 2022

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@tschatzl tschatzl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lgtm. Thanks, good catch.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 21, 2022

@albertnetymk This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8297349: Parallel: Use correct claim value for CLD oop iteration in PSScavengeCLDClosure

Reviewed-by: tschatzl, shade

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 19 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 42c2037: 8297382: Test fails to compile after JDK-8288047
  • 6d6046b: 8252713: jtreg time out of CtrlASCII.java seems to hang the Xserver.
  • 88957a7: 8297147: UnexpectedSourceImageSize test times out on slow machines when fastdebug is used
  • 0696854: 8297299: SequenceInputStream should not use Vector
  • f0e99c6: 8297301: Cleanup unused methods in JavaUtilJarAccess
  • 392ac70: 8297211: Expensive fillInStackTrace operation in HttpURLConnection.getOutputStream0 when no content-length in response
  • 5a45c25: 8297164: Update troff man pages and CheckManPageOptions.java
  • f12710e: 8288047: Accelerate Poly1305 on x86_64 using AVX512 instructions
  • cd6a203: 8297348: make CONF=xxx should match if xxx is an exact match
  • 817e039: 8297352: configure should check pandoc version
  • ... and 9 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/8b8d8481bc05eec70a1df832668322e5c17694d8...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Nov 21, 2022
Copy link
Member

@shipilev shipilev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks fine.

@albertnetymk
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks for the review.

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 22, 2022

Going to push as commit 0ac5b55.
Since your change was applied there have been 20 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 932bf35: 8297333: Parallel: Remove unused methods in PCIterateMarkAndPushClosure
  • 42c2037: 8297382: Test fails to compile after JDK-8288047
  • 6d6046b: 8252713: jtreg time out of CtrlASCII.java seems to hang the Xserver.
  • 88957a7: 8297147: UnexpectedSourceImageSize test times out on slow machines when fastdebug is used
  • 0696854: 8297299: SequenceInputStream should not use Vector
  • f0e99c6: 8297301: Cleanup unused methods in JavaUtilJarAccess
  • 392ac70: 8297211: Expensive fillInStackTrace operation in HttpURLConnection.getOutputStream0 when no content-length in response
  • 5a45c25: 8297164: Update troff man pages and CheckManPageOptions.java
  • f12710e: 8288047: Accelerate Poly1305 on x86_64 using AVX512 instructions
  • cd6a203: 8297348: make CONF=xxx should match if xxx is an exact match
  • ... and 10 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/8b8d8481bc05eec70a1df832668322e5c17694d8...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Nov 22, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Nov 22, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Nov 22, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 22, 2022

@albertnetymk Pushed as commit 0ac5b55.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@albertnetymk albertnetymk deleted the pgc-cld-type-fix branch November 22, 2022 14:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-gc hotspot-gc-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
3 participants