Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8298128: runtime/ErrorHandling/TestSigInfoInHsErrFile.java fails to find pattern with slowdebug #11704

Closed
wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

afshin-zafari
Copy link
Contributor

@afshin-zafari afshin-zafari commented Dec 16, 2022

Description

The following problems found and solved:

  1. Reporting which regex pattern did not match with error messages was incorrect. To report the mismatched pattern, the head of the pattern list was peeked, while it was the already peeked item from that did not match. So the next pattern to the mismatched one was reported.

  2. The pattern for finding a crash was incorrectly set to "# .*VMError::controlled_crash.*", while it has to be "# .*crash_with_segfault.*".

  3. crash_with_segfault function is too small and was inlined in compiler optimisations. So it was not in the stack trace when the error message is created.

Patch

1 and 2 corrected and added the NOINLINE to the crash_with_segfault signature. The same applied for crash_with_sigfpe function.

Test

runtime/ErrorHandling/* and tier1-5


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8298128: runtime/ErrorHandling/TestSigInfoInHsErrFile.java fails to find pattern with slowdebug

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/11704/head:pull/11704
$ git checkout pull/11704

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/11704
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/11704/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 11704

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 11704

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11704.diff

Sorry, something went wrong.

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Dec 16, 2022

👋 Welcome back afshin-zafari! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Dec 16, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 16, 2022

@afshin-zafari The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org label Dec 16, 2022
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Dec 16, 2022

Webrevs

@robehn
Copy link
Contributor

robehn commented Dec 16, 2022

Seems good to me! Thanks!

Copy link
Member

@dcubed-ojdk dcubed-ojdk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thumbs up. Thanks for the careful analysis and including
your testing information.

I've only posted nit comments about typos.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 16, 2022

@afshin-zafari This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8298128: runtime/ErrorHandling/TestSigInfoInHsErrFile.java fails to find pattern with slowdebug

Reviewed-by: dcubed, dholmes, stuefe

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 310 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • a2f6766: 8288415: java/awt/PopupMenu/PopupMenuLocation.java is unstable in MacOS machines
  • a734285: 8299879: CollectedHeap hierarchy should use override
  • 98d75f1: 8299038: Add AArch64 backend support for auto-vectorized FP16 conversions
  • cac72a6: 8300053: Shenandoah: Handle more GCCauses in ShenandoahControlThread::request_gc
  • 6fea233: 8299960: Speed up test/hotspot/jtreg/compiler/c2/irTests/TestVectorizeURShiftSubword.java
  • 7c1ebcc: 8299962: Speed up compiler/intrinsics/unsafe/DirectByteBufferTest.java and HeapByteBufferTest.java
  • abfd7e8: 8300113: C2: Single-bit fields with signed type in TypePtr after JDK-8297933
  • 83f2c9a: 8293410: Remove GenerateRangeChecks flag
  • 50e7df9: 8300024: Replace use of JNI_COMMIT mode with mode 0
  • fe7fca0: 8300032: DwarfParser resource leak
  • ... and 300 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/fa322e40b68abf0a253040d14414d41f4e01e028...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@dcubed-ojdk, @dholmes-ora, @tstuefe) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Dec 16, 2022
Copy link
Member

@dcubed-ojdk dcubed-ojdk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Still thumbs up

Copy link
Member

@dholmes-ora dholmes-ora left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The error was only occurring on a slow debug build, has the fix been tested on all builds?

Thanks.

@tstuefe
Copy link
Member

tstuefe commented Jan 10, 2023

@afshin-zafari, thank you for finding and fixing this.

I worry that this may be too fragile, since it depends on linker hints that AFAIK the linker could ignore. Could we instead match with something like "# .*(VMError::controlled_crash|crash_with).*"?

@afshin-zafari
Copy link
Contributor Author

@afshin-zafari, thank you for finding and fixing this.

I worry that this may be too fragile, since it depends on linker hints that AFAIK the linker could ignore. Could we instead match with something like "# .*(VMError::controlled_crash|crash_with).*"?

ALWAYSINLINE or its expanded form __attribute__ (always_inline) will prevail all other compile options for inlining (particularly compiler optimisation options) , e.g. limit number and/or do or don't inlining. So it would not be ignored as was not in tier 1-5 tests.

@tstuefe
Copy link
Member

tstuefe commented Jan 10, 2023

@afshin-zafari, thank you for finding and fixing this.
I worry that this may be too fragile, since it depends on linker hints that AFAIK the linker could ignore. Could we instead match with something like "# .*(VMError::controlled_crash|crash_with).*"?

ALWAYSINLINE or its expanded form __attribute__ (always_inline) will prevail all other compile options for inlining (particularly compiler optimisation options) , e.g. limit number and/or do or don't inlining. So it would not be ignored as was not in tier 1-5 tests.

Okay, good enough then. Just wanted to prevent false positives (we had a lot of work when writing tests for NMT call stack matching).

+1

Copy link
Member

@dcubed-ojdk dcubed-ojdk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You need to backout the copyright year changes to the two test files that
are no longer modified by this patch.

Copy link
Member

@dholmes-ora dholmes-ora left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good modulo the copyright changes that need undoing. Thanks.

@afshin-zafari
Copy link
Contributor Author

Copyright years are backed to 2022.

Copy link
Member

@dcubed-ojdk dcubed-ojdk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thumbs up.

@afshin-zafari
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Jan 16, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 16, 2023

@afshin-zafari
Your change (at version 653b373) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@robehn
Copy link
Contributor

robehn commented Jan 16, 2023

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 16, 2023

Going to push as commit 289aed4.
Since your change was applied there have been 310 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • a2f6766: 8288415: java/awt/PopupMenu/PopupMenuLocation.java is unstable in MacOS machines
  • a734285: 8299879: CollectedHeap hierarchy should use override
  • 98d75f1: 8299038: Add AArch64 backend support for auto-vectorized FP16 conversions
  • cac72a6: 8300053: Shenandoah: Handle more GCCauses in ShenandoahControlThread::request_gc
  • 6fea233: 8299960: Speed up test/hotspot/jtreg/compiler/c2/irTests/TestVectorizeURShiftSubword.java
  • 7c1ebcc: 8299962: Speed up compiler/intrinsics/unsafe/DirectByteBufferTest.java and HeapByteBufferTest.java
  • abfd7e8: 8300113: C2: Single-bit fields with signed type in TypePtr after JDK-8297933
  • 83f2c9a: 8293410: Remove GenerateRangeChecks flag
  • 50e7df9: 8300024: Replace use of JNI_COMMIT mode with mode 0
  • fe7fca0: 8300032: DwarfParser resource leak
  • ... and 300 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/fa322e40b68abf0a253040d14414d41f4e01e028...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jan 16, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jan 16, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels Jan 16, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 16, 2023

@robehn @afshin-zafari Pushed as commit 289aed4.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants