Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8299699: Test runtime/cds/appcds/WrongClasspath.java fails after JDK-8299329 #11882

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ashu-mehra
Copy link
Contributor

@ashu-mehra ashu-mehra commented Jan 6, 2023

Failure happens because TestCommon#patchJarForDynamicDump(String cp) expects the jar files passed in cp parameter are with absolute path. The new test case added for JDK 8299329 passed jar files using path relative to work dir.

        if (!firstJar.startsWith(expected)) {
            throw new RuntimeException("FIXME: jar file not at a supported location ('"
                                       + expected + "'): " + firstJar);
        }

This fix converts firstJar into real path using Path.toRealPath() before doing firstJar.startsWith(expected).
This way all relative paths are also converted to absolute paths before the check is performed.

I tested this fix by running WrongClasspath test with -Dtest.dynamic.cds.archive=true as:

$ java -jar /work/jtreg/build/images/jtreg/lib/jtreg.jar -Dtest.dynamic.cds.archive=true -jdk:/work/jdk/build/JDK-8299329-fd/images/jdk test/hotspot/jtreg/runtime/cds/appcds/WrongClasspath.java

Signed-off-by: Ashutosh Mehra asmehra@redhat.com


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8299699: Test runtime/cds/appcds/WrongClasspath.java fails after JDK-8299329

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/11882/head:pull/11882
$ git checkout pull/11882

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/11882
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/11882/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 11882

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 11882

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11882.diff

…8299329

Signed-off-by: Ashutosh Mehra <asmehra@redhat.com>
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jan 6, 2023

👋 Welcome back ashu-mehra! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jan 6, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 6, 2023

@ashu-mehra The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-runtime

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-runtime hotspot-runtime-dev@openjdk.org label Jan 6, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jan 6, 2023

Webrevs

@ashu-mehra
Copy link
Contributor Author

@iklam can you please review this PR.

@iklam
Copy link
Member

iklam commented Jan 6, 2023

Looks good to me. I have tested locally and the test passed. I'm now running the related test tasks in our CI to make sure the patch works with the other tests as well.

Copy link
Member

@iklam iklam left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tests passed.

I think this qualifies as a Trivial change so only one reviewer is needed.

@calvinccheung
Copy link
Member

I tested your patch by running the open/test/hotspot/jtreg:hotspot_appcds_dynamic test group with -Dtest.dynamic.cds.archive=true locally on linux-x64 and all 93 tests passed.

@ashu-mehra
Copy link
Contributor Author

@iklam @calvinccheung thanks for testing the patch.

@ashu-mehra
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 6, 2023

@ashu-mehra This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8299699: Test runtime/cds/appcds/WrongClasspath.java fails after JDK-8299329

Reviewed-by: iklam, ccheung

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 4 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 8c70bf3: 8299544: Improve performance of CRC32C intrinsics (non-AVX-512) for small inputs
  • d6e9f01: 8285416: [LOOM] Some nsk/jdi tests fail due to needing too many virtual threads
  • ba03f42: 8299746: Accept unknown signatureAlgorithm in PKCS7 SignerInfo
  • 3dcf700: 8299336: InputStream::DEFAULT_BUFFER_SIZE should be 16384

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@iklam, @calvinccheung) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jan 6, 2023
@calvinccheung
Copy link
Member

/sponsor

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Jan 6, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 6, 2023

@ashu-mehra
Your change (at version 3d9b330) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 6, 2023

Going to push as commit d6d6eb4.
Since your change was applied there have been 4 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 8c70bf3: 8299544: Improve performance of CRC32C intrinsics (non-AVX-512) for small inputs
  • d6e9f01: 8285416: [LOOM] Some nsk/jdi tests fail due to needing too many virtual threads
  • ba03f42: 8299746: Accept unknown signatureAlgorithm in PKCS7 SignerInfo
  • 3dcf700: 8299336: InputStream::DEFAULT_BUFFER_SIZE should be 16384

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jan 6, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jan 6, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels Jan 6, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 6, 2023

@calvinccheung @ashu-mehra Pushed as commit d6d6eb4.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@ashu-mehra ashu-mehra deleted the JDK-8299699 branch February 7, 2023 16:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-runtime hotspot-runtime-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
3 participants