New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8300590: [JVMCI] BytecodeFrame.equals is broken #12084
Conversation
👋 Welcome back dnsimon! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
c5ba4d7
to
6d211d9
Compare
Webrevs
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for fixing this Doug!
@dougxc This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 63 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
return false; | ||
} | ||
if (getClass() != obj.getClass()) { | ||
return false; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this comparison better/faster than instanceof, and allows the compiler to avoid repeating the same check on the checkcast below?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's what Eclipse auto-generates for equals
. I can confirm that Graal eliminates the check cast but don't think it's worth worrying about if not all compilers will.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good.
/integrate |
Going to push as commit 06394ee.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
BytecodeFrame.equals
returns true even when the frames are found to be not equal:jdk/src/jdk.internal.vm.ci/share/classes/jdk.vm.ci.code/src/jdk/vm/ci/code/BytecodeFrame.java
Line 375 in 7bf0d14
This PR fixes that, adds a test and improves both
BytecodeFrame.hashCode
andBytecodeFrame.equals
to take all fields into account.Given the nature of the bug in
BytecodeFrame.equals
that this PR fixes, it's pretty clear thatBytecodeFrame
has never been (reliably) used as a key in a map.Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/12084/head:pull/12084
$ git checkout pull/12084
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/12084
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/12084/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 12084
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 12084
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12084.diff