Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8300731: Avoid unnecessary array fill after creation in PaletteBuilder #12101

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

turbanoff
Copy link
Member

@turbanoff turbanoff commented Jan 19, 2023

No need to fill elements of array with null: it was just created. Java guarantees that all elements of array are nulls anyway.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8300731: Avoid unnecessary array fill after creation in PaletteBuilder

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/12101/head:pull/12101
$ git checkout pull/12101

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/12101
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/12101/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 12101

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 12101

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12101.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jan 19, 2023

👋 Welcome back aturbanov! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 19, 2023

@turbanoff The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • client

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the client client-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Jan 19, 2023
@mrserb
Copy link
Member

mrserb commented Jan 20, 2023

looks fine

@turbanoff turbanoff changed the title [PATCH] Avoid unnecessary array fill after creation 8300731: Avoid unnecessary array fill after creation in PaletteBuilder Jan 20, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jan 20, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jan 20, 2023

Webrevs

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 20, 2023

@turbanoff This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8300731: Avoid unnecessary array fill after creation in PaletteBuilder

Reviewed-by: prr, serb

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 23 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 5784eb7: 8300721: Cleanup ProblemList-svc-vthread.txt
  • 9d44dd0: 8297972: Poly1305 Endianness on ByteBuffer not enforced
  • facd415: 8297757: VarHandles.getStaticFieldFromBaseAndOffset should get the receiver type from VarHandle
  • e803855: 8299863: URLFromURITest.java should import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test
  • 92d8326: 8299827: Add resolved IP address in connection exception for sockets
  • c6d5600: 8038146: Clarify Map.Entry's connection to the underlying map
  • b2d3622: 8299896: Reduce enum values of HtmlLinkInfo.Kind
  • 623ba5b: 8300653: G1EvacInfo should use common naming scheme for collection set
  • 97c611d: 8289748: C2 compiled code crashes with SIGFPE with -XX:+StressLCM and -XX:+StressGCM
  • 4562b40: 8300682: InstanceKlassMiscStatus is a bad name
  • ... and 13 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/80ab50b3389cbdae6bced7cea3f3a84b94c5bb82...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jan 20, 2023
@turbanoff
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 21, 2023

Going to push as commit cbfc069.
Since your change was applied there have been 31 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 67b1c89: 8294693: Add Collections.shuffle overload that accepts RandomGenerator interface
  • c8dd758: 8300260: Remove metaprogramming/isSame.hpp
  • a6c2a2a: 8300692: GCC 12 reports some compiler warnings in bundled freetype
  • bb42e61: 8300493: Use ArraysSupport.vectorizedHashCode in j.u.zip.ZipCoder
  • 06394ee: 8300590: [JVMCI] BytecodeFrame.equals is broken
  • 5331a3e: 8298908: Instrument Metaspace for ASan
  • e1ee672: 8300725: Improve performance of ColorConvertOp for default destinations with alpha
  • 7c2f77a: 8300584: Accelerate AVX-512 CRC32C for small buffers
  • 5784eb7: 8300721: Cleanup ProblemList-svc-vthread.txt
  • 9d44dd0: 8297972: Poly1305 Endianness on ByteBuffer not enforced
  • ... and 21 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/80ab50b3389cbdae6bced7cea3f3a84b94c5bb82...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jan 21, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jan 21, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jan 21, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 21, 2023

@turbanoff Pushed as commit cbfc069.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
client client-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
4 participants