Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8300769: Remove G1CollectionSet::_inc_bytes_used_before #12113

Conversation

tschatzl
Copy link
Contributor

@tschatzl tschatzl commented Jan 20, 2023

Hi all,

please review this removal of G1CollectionSet::_inc_bytes_used_before; this variable holds the amount of bytes used in eden regions, updated during mutator time. At the start of gc its value is copied to G1CollectionSet::_bytes_used_before, and then never touched again. The _bytes_used_before is read at end of gc, and then reset.

This change simply removes _inc_bytes_used_before and directly uses _bytes_used_before to accumulate eden region used bytes.

Testing: gha

Thanks,
Thomas


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8300769: Remove G1CollectionSet::_inc_bytes_used_before

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/12113/head:pull/12113
$ git checkout pull/12113

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/12113
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/12113/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 12113

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 12113

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12113.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jan 20, 2023

👋 Welcome back tschatzl! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title 8300769 8300769: Remove G1CollectionSet::_inc_bytes_used_before Jan 20, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jan 20, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 20, 2023

@tschatzl The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-gc

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-gc hotspot-gc-dev@openjdk.org label Jan 20, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jan 20, 2023

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@albertnetymk albertnetymk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think _bytes_used is enough; the _before suffix adds nothing and it's confusing -- there's no counterpart like _bytes_used_after.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 20, 2023

@tschatzl This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8300769: Remove G1CollectionSet::_inc_bytes_used_before

Reviewed-by: ayang, iwalulya

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 27 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 859ca75: 8300862: Remove some G1 collection set remembered set debugging code
  • 048705c: 8300910: Remove metaprogramming/integralConstant.hpp
  • 544c16e: 8300266: Detect Virtualization on Linux aarch64
  • 57f2d48: 8300863: Remove C-style array declarations in java.io
  • 2292ce1: 8294677: chunklevel::MAX_CHUNK_WORD_SIZE too small for some applications
  • 6dd8723: 8290918: Initial nroff manpage generation for JDK 21
  • b3822f5: 8300589: Use @snippet and @linkplain in java.text.CollationKey and java.text.CompactNumberFormat
  • afd5921: 8298610: Refactor archiving of ConstantPool::resolved_references()
  • 937ba1c: 8300111: Add rpath for common lib locations for jpackageapplauncher
  • 2da2e5a: 8300946: Add sun/security/provider/certpath/OCSP/OCSPNoContentLength to ProblemList
  • ... and 17 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/5a4945c0d95423d0ab07762c915e9cb4d3c66abb...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jan 20, 2023
@tschatzl
Copy link
Contributor Author

tschatzl commented Jan 23, 2023

I think _bytes_used is enough; the _before suffix adds nothing and it's confusing -- there's no counterpart like _bytes_used_after.

I considered that, but you could argue that the metric gathered here is "bytes used before" (gc, in the collection set). The "bytes used after" is calculated on the spot when it's needed just before passing it on to JFR.
I'm good either way, if you still think it's better to remove the _before or the second reviewer suggests it too, I'll do the rename (in another RFE).

Copy link
Member

@walulyai walulyai left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lgtm!

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 23, 2023

@tschatzl this pull request can not be integrated into master due to one or more merge conflicts. To resolve these merge conflicts and update this pull request you can run the following commands in the local repository for your personal fork:

git checkout submit/8300769-remove-inc_bytes_used_before
git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk master
git merge FETCH_HEAD
# resolve conflicts and follow the instructions given by git merge
git commit -m "Merge master"
git push

@openjdk openjdk bot added merge-conflict Pull request has merge conflict with target branch and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated labels Jan 23, 2023
@tschatzl
Copy link
Contributor Author

@albertnetymk found that actually the information of _byte_used_before can be recreated from FreeCSetStats, so G1CollectionSet::_bytes_used_before can be removed as well.
Further I fixed the merge errors with latest version.

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed merge-conflict Pull request has merge conflict with target branch labels Jan 23, 2023
Copy link
Member

@walulyai walulyai left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Better!

@tschatzl
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for your reviews
/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 24, 2023

Going to push as commit 3be5758.
Since your change was applied there have been 27 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 859ca75: 8300862: Remove some G1 collection set remembered set debugging code
  • 048705c: 8300910: Remove metaprogramming/integralConstant.hpp
  • 544c16e: 8300266: Detect Virtualization on Linux aarch64
  • 57f2d48: 8300863: Remove C-style array declarations in java.io
  • 2292ce1: 8294677: chunklevel::MAX_CHUNK_WORD_SIZE too small for some applications
  • 6dd8723: 8290918: Initial nroff manpage generation for JDK 21
  • b3822f5: 8300589: Use @snippet and @linkplain in java.text.CollationKey and java.text.CompactNumberFormat
  • afd5921: 8298610: Refactor archiving of ConstantPool::resolved_references()
  • 937ba1c: 8300111: Add rpath for common lib locations for jpackageapplauncher
  • 2da2e5a: 8300946: Add sun/security/provider/certpath/OCSP/OCSPNoContentLength to ProblemList
  • ... and 17 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/5a4945c0d95423d0ab07762c915e9cb4d3c66abb...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jan 24, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jan 24, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jan 24, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 24, 2023

@tschatzl Pushed as commit 3be5758.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@tschatzl tschatzl deleted the submit/8300769-remove-inc_bytes_used_before branch January 26, 2023 09:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-gc hotspot-gc-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
3 participants