Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8300866: Declare some classes final in java.io #12141

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

minborg
Copy link
Contributor

@minborg minborg commented Jan 23, 2023

This PR proposes declaring some internal classes in java.io as final, explicitly indicating that they are not intended for sub-classing.

If you think declaring classes final is just "static noice", please see http://minborgsjavapot.blogspot.com/2021/12/why-general-inheritance-is-flawed-and.html first and then come back and comment on the issue.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/12141/head:pull/12141
$ git checkout pull/12141

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/12141
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/12141/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 12141

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 12141

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12141.diff

Sorry, something went wrong.

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jan 23, 2023

👋 Welcome back pminborg! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 23, 2023

@minborg The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Jan 23, 2023
@minborg minborg marked this pull request as ready for review January 23, 2023 15:00
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jan 23, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jan 23, 2023

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@AlanBateman AlanBateman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Look okay. We should probably think about removing ExpiringCache as it hasn't been used for many releases.

@minborg
Copy link
Contributor Author

minborg commented Jan 23, 2023

Look okay. We should probably think about removing ExpiringCache as it hasn't been used for many releases.

It looks like CE is used in UnixFileSystem via the system property "sun.io.useCanonCaches" ?

@minborg
Copy link
Contributor Author

minborg commented Jan 23, 2023

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 23, 2023

@minborg this pull request can not be integrated into master due to one or more merge conflicts. To resolve these merge conflicts and update this pull request you can run the following commands in the local repository for your personal fork:

git checkout javaio_final_classes
git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk master
git merge FETCH_HEAD
# resolve conflicts and follow the instructions given by git merge
git commit -m "Merge master"
git push

@openjdk openjdk bot added the merge-conflict Pull request has merge conflict with target branch label Jan 23, 2023
@AlanBateman
Copy link
Contributor

It looks like CE is used in UnixFileSystem via the system property "sun.io.useCanonCaches" ?

It was disabled in JDK 12 and the general plan was to eventually remove it eventually.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 23, 2023

@minborg This pull request has not yet been marked as ready for integration.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 23, 2023

@minborg This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8300866: Declare some classes final in java.io

Reviewed-by: alanb

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the master branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed merge-conflict Pull request has merge conflict with target branch labels Jan 23, 2023
@minborg
Copy link
Contributor Author

minborg commented Jan 23, 2023

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 23, 2023

Going to push as commit d117350.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jan 23, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jan 23, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jan 23, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 23, 2023

@minborg Pushed as commit d117350.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants