Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

JDK-8300867: Fix document issues in java.io #12142

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

minborg
Copy link
Contributor

@minborg minborg commented Jan 23, 2023

This PR fixes a couple of typos in the documentation.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/12142/head:pull/12142
$ git checkout pull/12142

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/12142
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/12142/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 12142

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 12142

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12142.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jan 23, 2023

👋 Welcome back pminborg! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jan 23, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 23, 2023

@minborg The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Jan 23, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jan 23, 2023

Webrevs

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 23, 2023

@minborg This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8300867: Fix document issues in java.io

Reviewed-by: alanb, lancea, iris

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 4 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • a56598f: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly
  • 542bfe6: 8300587: (bf) Some covariant overrides are missing @SInCE tags
  • 03a9a88: 8300265: Remove metaprogramming/isSigned.hpp
  • 5a4945c: 8299975: Limit underflow protection CMoveINode in PhaseIdealLoop::do_unroll must also protect type from underflow

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jan 23, 2023
@minborg
Copy link
Contributor Author

minborg commented Jan 23, 2023

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 23, 2023

Going to push as commit 4525aa3.
Since your change was applied there have been 6 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • a7f035d: 8300868: Reduce visibility in java.io.SerialCallbackContext
  • 079255e: 8300864: Declare some fields in java.io as final
  • a56598f: 8299684: (bf) JNI direct buffer functions with large capacity behave unexpectedly
  • 542bfe6: 8300587: (bf) Some covariant overrides are missing @SInCE tags
  • 03a9a88: 8300265: Remove metaprogramming/isSigned.hpp
  • 5a4945c: 8299975: Limit underflow protection CMoveINode in PhaseIdealLoop::do_unroll must also protect type from underflow

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jan 23, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jan 23, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jan 23, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 23, 2023

@minborg Pushed as commit 4525aa3.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
4 participants