New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8301459: Serial: Merge KeepAliveClosure into FastKeepAliveClosure #12310
Conversation
👋 Welcome back ayang! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@albertnetymk The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good.
There seems to be an opportunity to further clean this up by renaming FastKeepAliveClosure to KeepAliveClosure. I also think that the definition of this closure could be moved to defNewGeneration.cpp
@albertnetymk This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 5 new commits pushed to the
Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
Yes; will do so in a follow-up PR. |
Thanks for the review. /integrate |
Going to push as commit a0aed9b.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@albertnetymk Pushed as commit a0aed9b. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Simple removing unnecessary type hierarchy.
Test: hotspot_gc
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/12310/head:pull/12310
$ git checkout pull/12310
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/12310
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/12310/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 12310
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 12310
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12310.diff