Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

JDK-8301636: Minor cleanup in CommentHelper and DocPretty #12375

Conversation

jonathan-gibbons
Copy link
Contributor

@jonathan-gibbons jonathan-gibbons commented Feb 1, 2023

Please review some simple cleanup suggested by IntelliJ IDEA that would be too much of a distraction in an otherwise unrelated PR.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8301636: Minor cleanup in CommentHelper and DocPretty

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/12375/head:pull/12375
$ git checkout pull/12375

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/12375
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/12375/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 12375

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 12375

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12375.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Feb 1, 2023

👋 Welcome back jjg! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

Element e = getReferencedElement(dtree);
return getReferencedClass(e);
}

public TypeElement getReferencedClass(Element e) {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For what it's worth, I dislike the remaining getReferencedThing methods remaining in this class, since they are just null-safe wrappers around methods in Utils that are just wrappers for code in java.lang.model. But that's another more-manual cleanup for another day.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Feb 1, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 1, 2023

@jonathan-gibbons The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • compiler
  • javadoc

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added javadoc javadoc-dev@openjdk.org compiler compiler-dev@openjdk.org labels Feb 1, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Feb 1, 2023

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@pavelrappo pavelrappo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good (assuming tests pass).

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 1, 2023

@jonathan-gibbons This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8301636: Minor cleanup in CommentHelper and DocPretty

Reviewed-by: prappo

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 3 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 960c393: 8301393: Include cdb in the Windows devkit
  • 6c927c9: 8301299: Wrong class spec on sun.security.util.Pem
  • 51ac878: 8284236: Remove java/lang/ref/ReferenceEnqueue.java from ProblemList-Xcomp.txt

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Feb 1, 2023
@jonathan-gibbons
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 2, 2023

Going to push as commit 930ec00.
Since your change was applied there have been 28 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 725d57b: 8301659: Resolve initialization reordering issues on Windows for libawt and libsaproc
  • 2d50c7d: 8298979: Remove duplicated serviceability/jvmti/thread/GetAllThreads/allthr01/allthr01.java
  • 59b7fb1: 8300273: [IR framework] Handle message instead of bailing out
  • 5b1584b: 8298880: VectorLogicalOpIdentityTest.java IR test incorrectly use avx3 instead of avx512
  • 21c1afb: 8301612: OopLoadProxy constructor should be explicit
  • 03b23a1: 8301367: Add exception handler method to the BaseLdapServer
  • 7b6ac41: 8286876: NMT.test_unaliged_block_address_vm_assert fails if using clang toolchain
  • d097b5e: 8301508: Replace NULL with nullptr in os_cpu/linux_s390
  • c8307e3: 8301500: Replace NULL with nullptr in os_cpu/aix_ppc
  • 218223e: 8301501: Replace NULL with nullptr in os_cpu/bsd_aarch64
  • ... and 18 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/995210873497eb2400b7672096e6f3cac7fde9a6...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Feb 2, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Feb 2, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Feb 2, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 2, 2023

@jonathan-gibbons Pushed as commit 930ec00.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@jonathan-gibbons jonathan-gibbons deleted the 8301636.cleanup-CommentHelper-DocPretty branch February 2, 2023 15:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
compiler compiler-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated javadoc javadoc-dev@openjdk.org
2 participants