8343934: Problemlist java/util/BitSet/HugeToString.java

[sendaoYan]

Hi all,
Before the root cause of JDK-8343925 has been fixed, should we Problemlist the known failure test java/util/BitSet/HugeToString.java, to make less CI noisy.

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8343934: Problemlist java/util/BitSet/HugeToString.java (Sub-task - P4)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/22013/head:pull/22013
$ git checkout pull/22013

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/22013
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/22013/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 22013

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 22013

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22013.diff

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back syan! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

❗ This change is not yet ready to be integrated.
See the Progress checklist in the description for automated requirements.

[openjdk]

@sendaoYan To determine the appropriate audience for reviewing this pull request, one or more labels corresponding to different subsystems will normally be applied automatically. However, no automatic labelling rule matches the changes in this pull request. In order to have an "RFR" email sent to the correct mailing list, you will need to add one or more applicable labels manually using the /label pull request command.

Applicable Labels

• build
• client
• compiler
• core-libs
• graal
• hotspot
• hotspot-compiler
• hotspot-gc
• hotspot-jfr
• hotspot-runtime
• i18n
• ide-support
• javadoc
• jdk
• jmx
• kulla
• net
• nio
• security
• serviceability
• shenandoah

[liach]

We will most likely merge #22012 instead.

[sendaoYan]

We will most likely merge #22012 instead.

Thanks for the remind.