New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8288421: IGV: warn user about all unreachable nodes #9164
Conversation
👋 Welcome back rcastanedalo! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@robcasloz The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good, thanks for fixing this! And nice new warnings.
@robcasloz This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 12 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
Thanks for reviewing, Christian. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good.
Thanks for reviewing, Tobias! |
/integrate |
Going to push as commit f3da7ff.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@robcasloz Pushed as commit f3da7ff. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
This changeset ensures that, when approximating C2's schedule, IGV does not schedule unreachable nodes. Instead, a node warning is emitted, informing the user that the corresponding node is unreachable. This information can be useful when debugging ill-formed graphs.
The following clustered subgraph illustrates the proposed change:
Currently (before),
522 IfFalse
gets assigned the same block as256 Region
(B11
) in an effort to schedule as many nodes as possible, and hence no warning is emitted for522 IfFalse
, even though it is clearly control-unreachable (since it is a child of520 If
which is control-unreachable). This changeset (after) leaves instead522 IfFalse
unscheduled and emits a "Control-unreachable CFG node" warning for it (visible as a tooltip of the node warning sign).As a side-benefit, the changeset simplifies the IGV scheduling algorithm by removing the code that tries to schedule unrechable nodes code on a best-effort basis, and adds two additional node warnings ("Region with multiple successors" and "CFG node without control successors") to highlight the new nodes that might remain unscheduled as a consequence.
Testing
Tested manually on the graph attached to the JBS issue.
Tested automatically that scheduling tens of thousands of graphs (by instrumenting IGV to schedule parsed graphs eagerly and running
java -Xcomp -XX:-TieredCompilation -XX:PrintIdealGraphLevel=4
) does trigger any exception or assertion failure.Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/9164/head:pull/9164
$ git checkout pull/9164
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/9164
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/9164/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 9164
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 9164
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/9164.diff