Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8290162: Reset recursion counter missed in fix of JDK-8224267 #9464

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

prsadhuk
Copy link
Contributor

@prsadhuk prsadhuk commented Jul 12, 2022

recursionCount counter added in fix of JDK-8224267 is only reset when limit is reached, so it will behave incorrectly if JOptionPane.showMessageDialog continuously with the same message having newlines, so it needs to be reset also at appropriate location.
Fix to reset the counter before the recursive method is called.

Also, fix added to indicate the original message is truncated by adding ... (ellipsis) to the previous line of text if it recurses more than limit set.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8290162: Reset recursion counter missed in fix of JDK-8224267

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/9464/head:pull/9464
$ git checkout pull/9464

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/9464
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/9464/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 9464

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 9464

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/9464.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jul 12, 2022

👋 Welcome back psadhukhan! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jul 12, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 12, 2022

@prsadhuk The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • client

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the client client-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Jul 12, 2022
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jul 12, 2022

Webrevs

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 12, 2022

@prsadhuk This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8290162: Reset recursion counter missed in fix of JDK-8224267

Reviewed-by: prr

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 39 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 31f7fc0: 8283082: sun.security.x509.X509CertImpl.delete("x509.info.validity") nulls out info field
  • d9ca438: Merge
  • 3164c98: 8289148: j.l.foreign.VaList::nextVarg call could throw IndexOutOfBoundsException or even crash the VM
  • c3806b9: 8289709: fatal error: stuck in JvmtiVTMSTransitionDisabler::disable_VTMS_transitions
  • 39715f3: 8287902: UnreadableRB case in MissingResourceCauseTest is not working reliably on Windows
  • 62fbc3f: 8287379: Using @inheritdoc in an inapplicable context shouldn't crash javadoc
  • fed3af8: 8287809: Revisit implementation of memory session
  • e8568b8: 8290020: Deadlock in leakprofiler::emit_events during shutdown
  • 7f0e9bd: 8289745: JfrStructCopyFailed uses heap words instead of bytes for object sizes
  • 728157f: 8289917: Metadata for regionsRefilled of G1EvacuationStatistics event is wrong
  • ... and 29 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/46251bc6e248a19e8d78173ff8d0502c68ee1acb...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jul 12, 2022
@prsadhuk
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 13, 2022

Going to push as commit 6e18883.
Since your change was applied there have been 39 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 31f7fc0: 8283082: sun.security.x509.X509CertImpl.delete("x509.info.validity") nulls out info field
  • d9ca438: Merge
  • 3164c98: 8289148: j.l.foreign.VaList::nextVarg call could throw IndexOutOfBoundsException or even crash the VM
  • c3806b9: 8289709: fatal error: stuck in JvmtiVTMSTransitionDisabler::disable_VTMS_transitions
  • 39715f3: 8287902: UnreadableRB case in MissingResourceCauseTest is not working reliably on Windows
  • 62fbc3f: 8287379: Using @inheritdoc in an inapplicable context shouldn't crash javadoc
  • fed3af8: 8287809: Revisit implementation of memory session
  • e8568b8: 8290020: Deadlock in leakprofiler::emit_events during shutdown
  • 7f0e9bd: 8289745: JfrStructCopyFailed uses heap words instead of bytes for object sizes
  • 728157f: 8289917: Metadata for regionsRefilled of G1EvacuationStatistics event is wrong
  • ... and 29 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/46251bc6e248a19e8d78173ff8d0502c68ee1acb...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jul 13, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jul 13, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jul 13, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 13, 2022

@prsadhuk Pushed as commit 6e18883.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@prsadhuk prsadhuk deleted the reset-counter branch July 13, 2022 05:10
if (recursionCount++ > 200) {
recursionCount = 0;
addMessageComponents(container, cons, new String("..."),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hm. What was the reason to use new String constructor here? Is it some security issue?
Seems redundant to me.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
client client-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
3 participants