Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8289801: [IR Framework] Add flags to whitelist which can be used to simulate a specific machine setup like UseAVX #9509

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

DamonFool
Copy link
Member

@DamonFool DamonFool commented Jul 15, 2022

Hi all,

Please review this trivial change which adds UseAVX, UseSSE and UseSVE to the whitelist of IR test framework.

Thanks.
Best regards,
Jie


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8289801: [IR Framework] Add flags to whitelist which can be used to simulate a specific machine setup like UseAVX

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/9509/head:pull/9509
$ git checkout pull/9509

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/9509
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/9509/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 9509

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 9509

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/9509.diff

…imulate a specific machine setup like UseAVX
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jul 15, 2022

👋 Welcome back jiefu! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jul 15, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 15, 2022

@DamonFool The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org label Jul 15, 2022
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jul 15, 2022

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@vnkozlov vnkozlov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider adding IR tests to vector testing group which we (Oracle) run with different AVX,SSE settings:

test/hotspot/jtreg/TEST.groups
@@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ hotspot_containers_extended = \
 
 hotspot_vector_1 = \
   compiler/c2/cr6340864 \
+  compiler/c2/irTests \
   compiler/codegen \
   compiler/loopopts/superword \
   compiler/vectorapi \

I submitted testing with this additional change.

@vnkozlov
Copy link
Contributor

compiler/c2/irTests/TestVectorizeURShiftSubword.java test failed. Details in RFE.

@DamonFool
Copy link
Member Author

Consider adding IR tests to vector testing group which we (Oracle) run with different AVX,SSE settings:

IR tests had been added into vector testing.

@DamonFool
Copy link
Member Author

compiler/c2/irTests/TestVectorizeURShiftSubword.java test failed. Details in RFE.

Thanks @vnkozlov for the review and testing.

I can only reproduce the failure with UseSSE < 4, but passed with UseAVX=0 on x86.
The reason is that RShiftVB isn't supported with UseSSE < 4 on x86.
The fix just skips the test when UseSSE < 4 on x86.
Thanks.

Copy link

@XiaohongGong XiaohongGong left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me! Thanks!

Copy link
Member

@TobiHartmann TobiHartmann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me. I'll run testing and report back once it passed.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 18, 2022

@DamonFool This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8289801: [IR Framework] Add flags to whitelist which can be used to simulate a specific machine setup like UseAVX

Reviewed-by: kvn, xgong, thartmann

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 18 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • ea8b75c: 8290334: Update FreeType to 2.12.1
  • 6882f0e: 8290013: serviceability/jvmti/GetLocalVariable/GetLocalWithoutSuspendTest.java failed "assert(!in_vm) failed: Undersized StackShadowPages"
  • 92067e2: 8290137: riscv: small refactoring for add_memory_int32/64
  • 87340fd: 8288883: C2: assert(allow_address || t != T_ADDRESS) failed after JDK-8283091
  • bc7a1ea: 8288948: Few J2DBench tests indicate lower primitive drawing performance with metal rendering pipeline
  • 84f2314: 8286030: Avoid JVM crash when containers share the same /tmp dir
  • 4dd236b: 8290280: riscv: Clean up stack and register handling in interpreter
  • 522b657: Merge
  • 15d3329: 8281969: Bad result for the snippet @link tag if substring/regex consists of whitespace
  • c8e0315: 8290250: Shenandoah: disable Loom for iu mode
  • ... and 8 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/92deab546549ca549408a983fe361d9536d2cd37...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jul 18, 2022
@TobiHartmann
Copy link
Member

All tests passed.

Copy link
Contributor

@vnkozlov vnkozlov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good.

@DamonFool
Copy link
Member Author

Thank you all for the review and testing.
/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 18, 2022

Going to push as commit 4a4d8ed.
Since your change was applied there have been 26 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 5a96a5d: 8289612: Change hotspot/jtreg tests to not use Thread.stop
  • b65f7ec: 4887998: Use Integer.rotateLeft() and rotateRight() in crypto implementations
  • 6c8d0e6: 8282526: Default icon is not painted properly
  • e72742e: 8286172: Create an automated test for JDK-4516019
  • b9de0a7: 8284524: Create an automated test for JDK-4422362
  • 5ae4320: 8284767: Create an automated test for JDK-4422535
  • efed7a7: 8289908: Skip bounds check for cases when String is constructed from entirely used byte[]
  • b2010a7: 8287805: Shenandoah: consolidate evacuate-update-root closures
  • ea8b75c: 8290334: Update FreeType to 2.12.1
  • 6882f0e: 8290013: serviceability/jvmti/GetLocalVariable/GetLocalWithoutSuspendTest.java failed "assert(!in_vm) failed: Undersized StackShadowPages"
  • ... and 16 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/92deab546549ca549408a983fe361d9536d2cd37...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jul 18, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jul 18, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jul 18, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 18, 2022

@DamonFool Pushed as commit 4a4d8ed.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@DamonFool DamonFool deleted the JDK-8289801 branch July 18, 2022 22:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
4 participants