Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

6463708: DefaultButtonModel.setMnemonic generates ChangeEvent for no change #9536

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

prsadhuk
Copy link
Contributor

@prsadhuk prsadhuk commented Jul 18, 2022

For a DefaultButtonModel, setMnemonic() generates a ChangeEvent even if the new value is the same as the old value (that is, even if nothing has changed).
Fix is to fire StateChange event only if the value has changed.

This is consistent with other places like
https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/master/src/java.desktop/share/classes/javax/swing/colorchooser/DefaultColorSelectionModel.java#L103
https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/master/src/java.desktop/share/classes/javax/swing/DefaultSingleSelectionModel.java#L79
https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/master/src/java.desktop/share/classes/javax/swing/DefaultBoundedRangeModel.java#L309


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-6463708: DefaultButtonModel.setMnemonic generates ChangeEvent for no change

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/9536/head:pull/9536
$ git checkout pull/9536

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/9536
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/9536/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 9536

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 9536

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/9536.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jul 18, 2022

👋 Welcome back psadhukhan! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 18, 2022

@prsadhuk The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • client

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the client client-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Jul 18, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jul 18, 2022
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jul 18, 2022

Webrevs

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 18, 2022

@prsadhuk This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

6463708: DefaultButtonModel.setMnemonic generates ChangeEvent for no change

Reviewed-by: azvegint, prr

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 186 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jul 18, 2022
@prsadhuk
Copy link
Contributor Author

prsadhuk commented Aug 1, 2022

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 1, 2022

Going to push as commit f5d1b5b.
Since your change was applied there have been 261 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 30205bb: 8290966: G1: Record number of PLAB filled and number of direct allocations
  • 86ef7b2: 8289046: Undefined Behaviour in x86 class Assembler
  • d61c0c7: 8290497: some tests in com/sun/jdi fail on localized Windows platform
  • 7ff1969: 8290067: Show stack dimensions in UL logging when attaching threads
  • 257c71c: 8290062: Remove nmethodLocker for nmethods on-stack
  • d9cb410: 8290466: Default to --with-source-date=current to avoid unmodified Hotspot recompilation
  • acbe093: 8291559: x86: compiler/vectorization/TestReverseBitsVector.java fails
  • 32d410a: 8290868: NMT: MallocSiteTable statistics improvements
  • 3579024: 8288904: Incorrect memory ordering in UL
  • 470c0eb: 8290740: Catalog not used when the handler is null
  • ... and 251 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/46251bc6e248a19e8d78173ff8d0502c68ee1acb...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Aug 1, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Aug 1, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Aug 1, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 1, 2022

@prsadhuk Pushed as commit f5d1b5b.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@prsadhuk prsadhuk deleted the JDK-6463708 branch August 1, 2022 11:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
client client-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
3 participants