Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8291266: RenderPerfTest: missing content while rendering some primitives #9756

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

avu
Copy link
Contributor

@avu avu commented Aug 4, 2022

Do not cause redundant endEncoder calls with batch processing of drawing primitives


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8291266: RenderPerfTest: missing content while rendering some primitives

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/9756/head:pull/9756
$ git checkout pull/9756

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/9756
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/9756/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 9756

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 9756

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/9756.diff

Do not cause redundant endEncoder calls with batch processing of drawing primitives
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Aug 4, 2022

👋 Welcome back avu! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Aug 4, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 4, 2022

@avu The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • client

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the client client-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Aug 4, 2022
@mrserb
Copy link
Member

mrserb commented Aug 4, 2022

Is it possible to integrate DrawTest.java as a test case?

@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Aug 4, 2022

Webrevs

@avu
Copy link
Contributor Author

avu commented Aug 4, 2022

Looks like the only way is to use Robot. The problem is not reproducible with VolatileImage. I'll try to come up with something reliable.

@prrace
Copy link
Contributor

prrace commented Aug 5, 2022

Does this only show up as a problem on certain configurations ?
I ran your original test on my 16" x64 macbook pro and I wasn't sure what it was trying to show ...

@avu
Copy link
Contributor Author

avu commented Aug 5, 2022

The problem is only reproducible on M1 hardware (I've just double-checked that it's not reproducible on x64). The idea of the test is to trigger batch rendering introduced in JDK-8288948

Copy link
Contributor

@aghaisas aghaisas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me!

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 11, 2022

@avu This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8291266: RenderPerfTest: missing content while rendering some primitives

Reviewed-by: aghaisas, prr

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 102 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Aug 11, 2022
@avu
Copy link
Contributor Author

avu commented Aug 12, 2022

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 12, 2022

Going to push as commit 871b7da.
Since your change was applied there have been 111 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 0c40128: 7194212: NPE in Flow.visitIdent
  • 6eb7c3a: 8290732: JNI DestroyJavaVM can start shutdown when one non-daemon thread remains
  • 083e014: 8292233: Increase symtab hash table size
  • 45e5b31: 8292244: Remove unnecessary include directories
  • 9bfffa0: 8291945: Add OSInfo API for static OS information
  • bd58553: 8290833: Remove ConstantPoolCache::walk_entries_for_initialization()
  • 755ecf6: 8292153: x86: Represent Registers as values
  • dedc05c: 8291640: java/beans/XMLDecoder/8028054/Task.java should use the 3-arg Class.forName
  • 3d20a8b: 8291959: FileFontStrike#initNative does not properly initialize IG Table on Windows
  • a28ab7b: 8288568: Reduce runtime of java.security microbenchmarks
  • ... and 101 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/1b66cecd311cc56c968134ae3f8aeff2e8bfc970...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Aug 12, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Aug 12, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Aug 12, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 12, 2022

@avu Pushed as commit 871b7da.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
client client-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
4 participants