Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8292328 : AccessibleActionsTest.java test instruction for show popup on JLabel did not specify shift key #9868

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

lawrence-andrew
Copy link
Contributor

@lawrence-andrew lawrence-andrew commented Aug 13, 2022

Corrected the test instruction to show the popup menu on JLabel when voice over is enabled .

@shurymury


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8292328: AccessibleActionsTest.java test instruction for show popup on JLabel did not specify shift key

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/9868/head:pull/9868
$ git checkout pull/9868

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/9868
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/9868/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 9868

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 9868

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/9868.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Aug 13, 2022

👋 Welcome back lawrence-andrew! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Aug 13, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 13, 2022

@lawrence-andrew The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • client

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the client client-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Aug 13, 2022
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Aug 13, 2022

Webrevs

@honkar-jdk
Copy link
Contributor

Tested on Mac 12.3, (VO+Shift+m) for menu expansion works. The first and third tests work fine. In the second test (JTree), first level of expansion works on pressing (VO+space) but the expansion to leaf nodes doesn't occur on subsequent (VO+space).

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 6, 2022

@lawrence-andrew This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8292328: AccessibleActionsTest.java test instruction for show popup on JLabel did not specify shift key

Reviewed-by: serb, aivanov

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 476 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 5285035: 8294075: gtest/AsyncLogGtest crashes with SEGV
  • 696287d: 8294037: Using alias template to unify hashtables in AsyncLogWriter
  • 48cc156: 8293331: Refactor FileDispatcherImpl into operating system-specific components
  • f751e60: 8294197: Zero: JVM_handle_linux_signal should not assume deopt NOPs
  • 4a6060b: 8294190: Incorrect check messages in SharedRuntime::generate_uncommon_trap_blob
  • 0be2b2c: 8292756: java.lang.AssertionError at at jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.code.Scope$ScopeImpl.leave(Scope.java:386)
  • bc2af47: 8254711: Add java.security.Provider.getService JFR Event
  • d781ab0: 8294003: Don't handle si_addr == 0 && si_code == SI_KERNEL SIGSEGVs
  • a216960: 8294087: RISC-V: RVC: Fix a potential alignment issue and add more alignment assertions for the patchable calls/nops
  • 3fa6778: 8292296: Use multiple threads to process ParallelGC deferred updates
  • ... and 466 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/1c1c4410b20f598c7e81fae044b6cb298ed12bab...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@mrserb, @aivanov-jdk) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Sep 6, 2022
@lawrence-andrew
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Sep 7, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 7, 2022

@lawrence-andrew
Your change (at version e566299) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@aivanov-jdk
Copy link
Member

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 22, 2022

Going to push as commit df53fa7.
Since your change was applied there have been 476 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 5285035: 8294075: gtest/AsyncLogGtest crashes with SEGV
  • 696287d: 8294037: Using alias template to unify hashtables in AsyncLogWriter
  • 48cc156: 8293331: Refactor FileDispatcherImpl into operating system-specific components
  • f751e60: 8294197: Zero: JVM_handle_linux_signal should not assume deopt NOPs
  • 4a6060b: 8294190: Incorrect check messages in SharedRuntime::generate_uncommon_trap_blob
  • 0be2b2c: 8292756: java.lang.AssertionError at at jdk.compiler/com.sun.tools.javac.code.Scope$ScopeImpl.leave(Scope.java:386)
  • bc2af47: 8254711: Add java.security.Provider.getService JFR Event
  • d781ab0: 8294003: Don't handle si_addr == 0 && si_code == SI_KERNEL SIGSEGVs
  • a216960: 8294087: RISC-V: RVC: Fix a potential alignment issue and add more alignment assertions for the patchable calls/nops
  • 3fa6778: 8292296: Use multiple threads to process ParallelGC deferred updates
  • ... and 466 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/1c1c4410b20f598c7e81fae044b6cb298ed12bab...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Sep 22, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Sep 22, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels Sep 22, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 22, 2022

@aivanov-jdk @lawrence-andrew Pushed as commit df53fa7.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
client client-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
4 participants