New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8292499: CDS ArchivedEnumTest.java fails: object points to a static field that may be reinitialized #9926
Conversation
…ield that may be reinitialized
…ArchivedEnumTest-failure
👋 Welcome back iklam! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can't say I understand the underlying issue that CDSHeapVerifier deals with, but adding this additional exclusion seems fine and trivial.
Thanks.
@iklam This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 6 new commits pushed to the
Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. I've tried this patch and it works.
Thanks @calvinccheung and @dholmes-ora for the review. |
Going to push as commit 964aac2.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
Plrease review this trivial PR:
The self-diagnostic test in CDS is too strict.
AccessFlag$Location::EMPTY_SET
is the same archived object asImmutableCollections::EMPTY_SET
, so at runtime we can guarantee the object equality of these two static fields.This PR fixes the immediate problem, so that with
java -Xshare:dump
you won't see spurious warning messages. I am working on a more comprehensive fix in JDK-8292635Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/9926/head:pull/9926
$ git checkout pull/9926
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/9926
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/9926/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 9926
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 9926
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/9926.diff