Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8293701: jdeps InverseDepsAnalyzer runs into NoSuchElementException: No value present #806

Closed

Conversation

MBaesken
Copy link
Member

@MBaesken MBaesken commented Oct 19, 2022


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8293701: jdeps InverseDepsAnalyzer runs into NoSuchElementException: No value present

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev pull/806/head:pull/806
$ git checkout pull/806

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/806
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev pull/806/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 806

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 806

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/806.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Oct 19, 2022

👋 Welcome back mbaesken! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 953ce8da2c7ddd60b09a18c7875616a2477e5ba5 8293701: jdeps InverseDepsAnalyzer runs into NoSuchElementException: No value present Oct 19, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 19, 2022

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 19, 2022

@MBaesken This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8293701: jdeps InverseDepsAnalyzer runs into NoSuchElementException: No value present

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the master branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Oct 19, 2022
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Oct 19, 2022

Webrevs

@MBaesken
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 25, 2022

Going to push as commit b6f8f49.
Since your change was applied there have been 11 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • cb9289e: 8295429: Update harfbuzz md file
  • 120bf27: 8293657: sun/management/jmxremote/bootstrap/RmiBootstrapTest.java#id1 failed with "SSLHandshakeException: Remote host terminated the handshake"
  • bd2fac8: 8293891: gc/g1/mixedgc/TestOldGenCollectionUsage.java (still) assumes that GCs take 1ms minimum
  • 2f99fbb: 8293489: Accept CAs with BasicConstraints without pathLenConstraint
  • e2b0925: 8284771: java/util/zip/CloseInflaterDeflaterTest.java failed with "AssertionError: Expected IOException to be thrown, but nothing was thrown"
  • 491d800: 8293659: Improve UnsatisfiedLinkError error message to include dlopen error details
  • 525b9fc: 8284690: [macos] VoiceOver : Getting java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Invalid location on Editable JComboBox
  • 0071802: 8286313: [macos] Voice over reads the boolean value as null in the JTable
  • 7893f14: 8295469: S390X: Optimized builds are broken
  • feb6b3c: 8294578: [PPC64] C2: Missing is_oop information when using disjoint compressed oops mode
  • ... and 1 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/compare/2f2b914794fd6fa6bf33fe49620e91bff1103f49...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Oct 25, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Oct 25, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Oct 25, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 25, 2022

@MBaesken Pushed as commit b6f8f49.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport clean integrated Pull request has been integrated
1 participant