8284533: Improve InterpreterCodelet data footprint

[dchuyko]

Original patch does not apply because of different NOT_PRODUCT fields of InterpreterCodelet. Repeated exactly the meaningful part: moving 3 fields in a new order after the NOT_PRODUCT part. Comments and white space 'after' are just like in the original diff.

Testing: tier1, tier2 on aarch64.

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8284533: Improve InterpreterCodelet data footprint

Reviewers

• Paul Hohensee (@phohensee - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev pull/878/head:pull/878
$ git checkout pull/878

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/878
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev pull/878/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 878

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 878

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/878.diff

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back dchuyko! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (e1a7eeff)

[phohensee]

Lgtm.

[openjdk]

@dchuyko This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8284533: Improve InterpreterCodelet data footprint

Reviewed-by: phh

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 50 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• 10b7a6d: 8289524: Add JFR JIT restart event
• 8ce7bb4: 8029633: Raw inner class constructor ref should not perform diamond inference
• cfedd3f: 8294307: ISO 4217 Amendment 173 Update
• 175bd05: 8285794: AsyncGetCallTrace might acquire a lock via JavaThread::thread_from_jni_environment
• 3486bb2: 8295872: [PPC64] JfrGetCallTrace: Need pc == nullptr check before frame constructor
• 7d17479: 8296480: java/security/cert/pkix/policyChanges/TestPolicy.java is failing
• b5710c4: 8296108: (tz) Update Timezone Data to 2022f
• f29ade7: 8286872: Refactor add/modify notification icon (TrayIcon)
• cd4cc5d: 8255439: System Tray icons get corrupted when Windows scaling changes
• 3d18b23: 8202836: [macosx] test java/awt/Graphics/TextAAHintsTest.java fails
• ... and 40 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/compare/996c0e9317ae9ff0b4ad88d4d050caf2ecf64811...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@phohensee) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

[dchuyko]

/integrate

[openjdk]

@dchuyko
Your change (at version e1a7eef) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

[phohensee]

/sponsor

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit 32aec43.
Since your change was applied there have been 51 commits pushed to the master branch:

• d4d4dbc: 8295419: JFR: Change name of jdk.JitRestart
• 10b7a6d: 8289524: Add JFR JIT restart event
• 8ce7bb4: 8029633: Raw inner class constructor ref should not perform diamond inference
• cfedd3f: 8294307: ISO 4217 Amendment 173 Update
• 175bd05: 8285794: AsyncGetCallTrace might acquire a lock via JavaThread::thread_from_jni_environment
• 3486bb2: 8295872: [PPC64] JfrGetCallTrace: Need pc == nullptr check before frame constructor
• 7d17479: 8296480: java/security/cert/pkix/policyChanges/TestPolicy.java is failing
• b5710c4: 8296108: (tz) Update Timezone Data to 2022f
• f29ade7: 8286872: Refactor add/modify notification icon (TrayIcon)
• cd4cc5d: 8255439: System Tray icons get corrupted when Windows scaling changes
• ... and 41 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/compare/996c0e9317ae9ff0b4ad88d4d050caf2ecf64811...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@phohensee @dchuyko Pushed as commit 32aec43.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.