8298919: Add a regression test for JDK-8298520

[TobiHartmann]

The fix for JDK-8298520 does not include a regression test. In the meantime, the JavaFuzzer found one. Let's add a simplified version of it.

Thanks,
Tobias

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8298919: Add a regression test for JDK-8298520

Reviewers

• Christian Hagedorn (@chhagedorn - Reviewer)
• Roland Westrelin (@rwestrel - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk20 pull/44/head:pull/44
$ git checkout pull/44

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/44
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk20 pull/44/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 44

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 44

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk20/pull/44.diff

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back thartmann! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@TobiHartmann The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• hotspot-compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (00138950)

[chhagedorn]

Thanks for adding that test! Looks good and trivial.

[openjdk]

@TobiHartmann This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8298919: Add a regression test for JDK-8298520

Reviewed-by: chagedorn, roland

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 3 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• b14794d: 8298852: Use of uninitialized memory in MetadataFactory::free_metadata
• f771c56: 8298797: Specification of some restricted methods is incorrect
• 0ba4734: 8287699: jdk/jfr/api/consumer/TestRecordingFileWrite.java fails with exception: java.lang.Exception: Found event that should not be there.

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

[TobiHartmann]

Thanks for the review, Christian!

[rwestrel]

Looks good to me.

[TobiHartmann]

Thanks, Roland!

[TobiHartmann]

/integrate

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit 9e10f00.
Since your change was applied there have been 3 commits pushed to the master branch:

• b14794d: 8298852: Use of uninitialized memory in MetadataFactory::free_metadata
• f771c56: 8298797: Specification of some restricted methods is incorrect
• 0ba4734: 8287699: jdk/jfr/api/consumer/TestRecordingFileWrite.java fails with exception: java.lang.Exception: Found event that should not be there.

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@TobiHartmann Pushed as commit 9e10f00.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.