Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8293540: [Metrics] Incorrectly detected resource limits with additional cgroup fs mounts #221

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

jmtd
Copy link
Contributor

@jmtd jmtd commented Jan 3, 2023

This is a backport of 8293540 to jdk8u-dev for cgroups v2 support.

Unclean: new test (TestDockerBasic.java) needed adjustments for the 8u test library paths and available methods.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8293540: [Metrics] Incorrectly detected resource limits with additional cgroup fs mounts

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev pull/221/head:pull/221
$ git checkout pull/221

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/221
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev pull/221/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 221

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 221

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev/pull/221.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jan 3, 2023

👋 Welcome back jdowland! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into pr/220 will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 6d83482a6b5f1898514fd450d8143dbfef57e362 8293540: [Metrics] Incorrectly detected resource limits with additional cgroup fs mounts Jan 3, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 3, 2023

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk openjdk bot added backport rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jan 3, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jan 3, 2023

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@jerboaa jerboaa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One test related issue, looks good otherwise.

@@ -359,6 +364,13 @@ private void doMultipleCpusetMountsTest(Path info) throws IOException {
CgroupInfo cpuSetInfo = res.getInfos().get("cpuset");
assertEquals("/sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset", cpuSetInfo.getMountPoint());
assertEquals("/", cpuSetInfo.getMountRoot());
// Ensure controllers at /sys/fs/cgroup will be used
String[] ctrlNames = new String[] { "memory", "cpu", "cpuacct", "blkio", "pids" };
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The pids controller is not present in 8u (JDK-8266490). This results in a test failure (NPE). Please remove it.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jmtd This would also need fixing --^ :)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The pids controller is not present in 8u (JDK-8266490). This results in a test failure (NPE). Please remove it.

Thanks for catching. Confirmed, removed, re-tested, pushed.

@openjdk-notifier openjdk-notifier bot changed the base branch from pr/220 to master January 19, 2023 14:39
@openjdk-notifier
Copy link

The parent pull request that this pull request depends on has now been integrated and the target branch of this pull request has been updated. This means that changes from the dependent pull request can start to show up as belonging to this pull request, which may be confusing for reviewers. To remedy this situation, simply merge the latest changes from the new target branch into this pull request by running commands similar to these in the local repository for your personal fork:

git checkout 8293540-jdk8u-dev
git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev master
git merge FETCH_HEAD
# if there are conflicts, follow the instructions given by git merge
git commit -m "Merge master"
git push

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 19, 2023

@jmtd this pull request can not be integrated into master due to one or more merge conflicts. To resolve these merge conflicts and update this pull request you can run the following commands in the local repository for your personal fork:

git checkout 8293540-jdk8u-dev
git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk8u-dev master
git merge FETCH_HEAD
# resolve conflicts and follow the instructions given by git merge
git commit -m "Merge master"
git push

@openjdk openjdk bot added the merge-conflict Pull request has merge conflict with target branch label Jan 19, 2023
@jerboaa
Copy link
Contributor

jerboaa commented Jan 19, 2023

@jmtd Please rebase this onto master when you get a chance. Thanks!

@jmtd
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmtd commented Jan 20, 2023

@jerboaa:

@jmtd Please rebase this onto master when you get a chance. Thanks!

Done :)

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 20, 2023

@jmtd Please do not rebase or force-push to an active PR as it invalidates existing review comments. Note for future reference, the bots always squash all changes into a single commit automatically as part of the integration. See OpenJDK Developers’ Guide for more information.

@openjdk openjdk bot removed the merge-conflict Pull request has merge conflict with target branch label Jan 20, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@jerboaa jerboaa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks OK now. Thanks.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 23, 2023

@jmtd This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8293540: [Metrics] Incorrectly detected resource limits with additional cgroup fs mounts

Reviewed-by: sgehwolf

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the master branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jan 23, 2023
@jmtd
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmtd commented Jan 24, 2023

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 24, 2023

Going to push as commit a5bd901.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jan 24, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jan 24, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jan 24, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 24, 2023

@jmtd Pushed as commit a5bd901.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport integrated Pull request has been integrated
2 participants