Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8237505: RadioMenuItem in ToggleGroup: deselected on accelerator #1002

Closed

Conversation

karthikpandelu
Copy link
Member

@karthikpandelu karthikpandelu commented Jan 19, 2023

No check was present in RadioMenuItem accelerator to see if it is in a ToggleGroup or not.

Made changes to check if RadioMenuItem is part of ToggleGroup or not. If it is part of a ToggleGroup, then it can not be cleared using accelerator.

Added test to validate the change.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8237505: RadioMenuItem in ToggleGroup: deselected on accelerator

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jfx pull/1002/head:pull/1002
$ git checkout pull/1002

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/1002
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jfx pull/1002/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 1002

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 1002

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1002.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jan 19, 2023

👋 Welcome back kpk! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Ready for review label Jan 19, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jan 19, 2023

Webrevs

@andy-goryachev-oracle
Copy link
Contributor

This looks good, given the decision to not to allow deselection by an accelerator.

But I wonder if the right approach is to have a property in the ToggleGroup which determines whether to allow all items to be deselected. If set, the radio menu items should be allowed to be deselected by both keyboard and mouse; if not set, the first item added to a group should be automatically selected, and radio menu items would not get deselected by the mouse or keyboard.

I think it might qualify as a separate enhancement (and a welcome one, since it saves some boilerplate code).

Copy link
Contributor

@andy-goryachev-oracle andy-goryachev-oracle left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tested with the MonkeyTester app.

I'd like to have a discussion on a new ToggleGroup's property (i'll send an email to the mailing list).

@@ -175,7 +175,12 @@ private static void doAcceleratorInstall(final List<? extends MenuItem> items, f
}
if (!menuitem.isDisable()) {
if (menuitem instanceof RadioMenuItem) {
((RadioMenuItem)menuitem).setSelected(!((RadioMenuItem)menuitem).isSelected());
if(((RadioMenuItem)menuitem).getToggleGroup() == null){
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

minor: this group insists on adding spaces after "if" and before "{"

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You can use a pattern variable here to get rid of all the casts.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated the code to address above comments

@karthikpandelu
Copy link
Member Author

Tested with the MonkeyTester app.

I'd like to have a discussion on a new ToggleGroup's property (i'll send an email to the mailing list).

I saw the mail chain sent out for this discussion. I agree that if any changes required as a result of this discussion can be taken as separate enhancement as you mentioned in the previous comment.

Copy link
Contributor

@andy-goryachev-oracle andy-goryachev-oracle left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

Copy link
Collaborator

@aghaisas aghaisas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The fix looks good to me!

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 25, 2023

@karthikpandelu This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8237505: RadioMenuItem in ToggleGroup: deselected on accelerator

Reviewed-by: angorya, aghaisas

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 18 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@andy-goryachev-oracle, @aghaisas) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Ready to be integrated label Jan 25, 2023
@karthikpandelu
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Ready to sponsor label Jan 25, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 25, 2023

@karthikpandelu
Your change (at version 42e8c39) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@karthikpandelu
Copy link
Member Author

@aghaisas please sponsor the PR.

@aghaisas
Copy link
Collaborator

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 25, 2023

Going to push as commit e234c89.
Since your change was applied there have been 18 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jan 25, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jan 25, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Ready to be integrated rfr Ready for review sponsor Ready to sponsor labels Jan 25, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 25, 2023

@aghaisas @karthikpandelu Pushed as commit e234c89.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@karthikpandelu karthikpandelu deleted the radiomenu_issue_fix branch January 30, 2023 06:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
integrated Pull request has been integrated
4 participants