Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8303026: [TextField] IOOBE on setting text with control characters that replaces existing text #1043

Closed

Conversation

jperedadnr
Copy link
Collaborator

@jperedadnr jperedadnr commented Feb 21, 2023

This PR fixes a regression after JDK-8212102.

When a TextField control has some previous content, and new text with only invalid characters (0x7F, new line, tabs, <0x20) is set, TextInputControl::filterInput is used to strip them out, and the new text has length 0.

During the refactoring in JDK-8212102, the checks:

int length = txt.length();
if (end > start + length) end = length;
if (start > length-1) start = end = 0;

were removed.

In this particular case, when the new filtered text has length 0, we need those checks, so start and end are set to 0, and txt.substring(start, end) doesn't throw the IOOBE anymore.

A test is added to verify this scenario. It fails with the proposed patch, passes with it.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8303026: [TextField] IOOBE on setting text with control characters that replaces existing text

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jfx pull/1043/head:pull/1043
$ git checkout pull/1043

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/1043
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jfx pull/1043/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 1043

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 1043

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1043.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Feb 21, 2023

👋 Welcome back jpereda! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Ready for review label Feb 21, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Feb 21, 2023

Webrevs

@@ -543,6 +543,13 @@ public Integer fromString(String value) {
assertEquals("200", txtField.getText());
}

@Test public void stripInvalidCharacters() {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1 for unit test!

Copy link
Contributor

@andy-goryachev-oracle andy-goryachev-oracle left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the fix is verified with the MonkeyTester application.

@arapte
Copy link
Member

arapte commented Mar 2, 2023

The regression bug-id mentioned in PR description is incorrect: JDK-8212102 is a similar bug. and, JDK-8176270 is the regression causing bug, which correctly mentioned in JBS. I would recommend to correct the description for correct record.

The fix itself looks good.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 2, 2023

@jperedadnr This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8303026: [TextField] IOOBE on setting text with control characters that replaces existing text

Reviewed-by: angorya, arapte

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 11 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Ready to be integrated label Mar 2, 2023
@jperedadnr
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 2, 2023

Going to push as commit 9df6039.
Since your change was applied there have been 11 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Mar 2, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Mar 2, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Ready to be integrated rfr Ready for review labels Mar 2, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 2, 2023

@jperedadnr Pushed as commit 9df6039.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
integrated Pull request has been integrated
3 participants