Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

7902: UseCompressedOopsRule has flipped comparison #432

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

Gunde
Copy link
Collaborator

@Gunde Gunde commented Sep 28, 2022

The UseCompressedOopsRule implementation was checking that CompressedOops were disabled for heaps larger than 32 GiB, this is the opposite of what it should do. Compressed Oops are helpful for smaller heaps.


Progress

  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Committer)

Issue

  • JMC-7902: UseCompressedOopsRule has flipped comparison

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jmc pull/432/head:pull/432
$ git checkout pull/432

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/432
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jmc pull/432/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 432

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 432

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jmc/pull/432.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Sep 28, 2022

👋 Welcome back hdafgard! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr label Sep 28, 2022
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Sep 28, 2022

Webrevs

Copy link
Collaborator

@RealCLanger RealCLanger left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch. Please update the copyright year before merging.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 29, 2022

@Gunde This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

7902: UseCompressedOopsRule has flipped comparison

Reviewed-by: clanger, bdutheil

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 2 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 9d99d88: 7910: Fix spotless finding after JMC-7903
  • 7cd2f3e: 7903: FastAccessNumberMap is slow for sparse values

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready label Sep 29, 2022
@Gunde
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Gunde commented Sep 29, 2022

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 29, 2022

Going to push as commit 1696e03.
Since your change was applied there have been 2 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 9d99d88: 7910: Fix spotless finding after JMC-7903
  • 7cd2f3e: 7903: FastAccessNumberMap is slow for sparse values

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated label Sep 29, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Sep 29, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 29, 2022

@Gunde Pushed as commit 1696e03.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
3 participants