Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8295353: Mark Register v24 as Volatile in Foreign Function & Memory C ABI Definition #743

Closed

Conversation

swesonga
Copy link
Contributor

@swesonga swesonga commented Oct 14, 2022

The C ABI defined by the Foreign Function & Memory API does not include v24 in the list of volatile floating point vector registers. As per the spec, v16-v31 do not need to be preserved. See https://github.com/ARM-software/abi-aa/blob/main/aapcs64/aapcs64.rst#612simd-and-floating-point-registers


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Committer)

Issue

  • JDK-8295353: Mark Register v24 as Volatile in Foreign Function & Memory C ABI Definition

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/panama-foreign pull/743/head:pull/743
$ git checkout pull/743

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/743
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/panama-foreign pull/743/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 743

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 743

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/panama-foreign/pull/743.diff

@swesonga swesonga marked this pull request as draft October 14, 2022 16:08
@bridgekeeper bridgekeeper bot added the oca Needs verification of OCA signatory status label Oct 14, 2022
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Oct 14, 2022

Hi @swesonga, welcome to this OpenJDK project and thanks for contributing!

We do not recognize you as Contributor and need to ensure you have signed the Oracle Contributor Agreement (OCA). If you have not signed the OCA, please follow the instructions. Please fill in your GitHub username in the "Username" field of the application. Once you have signed the OCA, please let us know by writing /signed in a comment in this pull request.

If you already are an OpenJDK Author, Committer or Reviewer, please click here to open a new issue so that we can record that fact. Please use "Add GitHub user swesonga" as summary for the issue.

If you are contributing this work on behalf of your employer and your employer has signed the OCA, please let us know by writing /covered in a comment in this pull request.

@swesonga
Copy link
Contributor Author

/covered

@bridgekeeper bridgekeeper bot added the oca-verify Needs verification of OCA signatory status label Oct 14, 2022
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Oct 14, 2022

Thank you! Please allow for a few business days to verify that your employer has signed the OCA. Also, please note that pull requests that are pending an OCA check will not usually be evaluated, so your patience is appreciated!

@bridgekeeper bridgekeeper bot removed oca Needs verification of OCA signatory status oca-verify Needs verification of OCA signatory status labels Oct 27, 2022
@JornVernee
Copy link
Member

Is this still supposed to be a draft?

@swesonga swesonga marked this pull request as ready for review November 1, 2022 03:14
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Ready for review label Nov 1, 2022
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Nov 1, 2022

Webrevs

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 1, 2022

@swesonga This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8295353: Mark Register v24 as Volatile in Foreign Function & Memory C ABI Definition

Reviewed-by: jvernee

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 203 new commits pushed to the foreign-memaccess+abi branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@JornVernee) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Ready to be integrated label Nov 1, 2022
@swesonga
Copy link
Contributor Author

swesonga commented Nov 1, 2022

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Ready to sponsor label Nov 1, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 1, 2022

@swesonga
Your change (at version 9c4c080) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@JornVernee
Copy link
Member

/integrate

@JornVernee
Copy link
Member

Thanks for fixing!

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 1, 2022

@JornVernee Only the author (@swesonga) is allowed to issue the integrate command. As this pull request is ready to be sponsored, and you are an eligible sponsor, did you mean to issue the /sponsor command?

@JornVernee
Copy link
Member

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 1, 2022

Going to push as commit bee7072.
Since your change was applied there have been 203 commits pushed to the foreign-memaccess+abi branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Nov 1, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Nov 1, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Ready to be integrated rfr Ready for review sponsor Ready to sponsor labels Nov 1, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 1, 2022

@JornVernee @swesonga Pushed as commit bee7072.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
integrated Pull request has been integrated
2 participants