Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merge jdk #850

Closed
wants to merge 111 commits into from
Closed

Merge jdk #850

wants to merge 111 commits into from

Conversation

MrSimms
Copy link
Member

@MrSimms MrSimms commented May 24, 2023

Merge jdk-21+14


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla.git pull/850/head:pull/850
$ git checkout pull/850

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/850
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla.git pull/850/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 850

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 850

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/850.diff

Sorry, something went wrong.

Vladimir Kozlov and others added 30 commits March 9, 2023 03:26
…6ToFloat yields different result than the interpreter

Reviewed-by: sviswanathan, jbhateja, vlivanov
… wrongly split thru phi

Reviewed-by: kvn, thartmann
Co-authored-by: Emanuel Peter <epeter@openjdk.org>
Reviewed-by: epeter, kvn
…en IPv6 enabled

Reviewed-by: djelinski, michaelm
…ll in early potential CHECK_NULL return

Reviewed-by: weijun
Reviewed-by: tschatzl, iwalulya
Reviewed-by: ihse, psandoz, mcimadamore
… com/sun/jdi tests

Reviewed-by: cjplummer, sspitsyn
…nts don't match for : VirtualThread-unparker"

Reviewed-by: sspitsyn, kevinw
…d_blob(pc())) failed: Must be the same" or SIGSEGV

Reviewed-by: coleenp, sspitsyn
Reviewed-by: vromero
@MrSimms
Copy link
Member Author

MrSimms commented May 24, 2023

/summary Merge jdk-21+14

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented May 24, 2023

👋 Welcome back dsimms! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into lworld will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 24, 2023

@MrSimms This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

Merge jdk

Merge jdk-21+14

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the lworld branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the lworld branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 24, 2023

@MrSimms Setting summary to Merge jdk-21+14

@MrSimms
Copy link
Member Author

MrSimms commented May 24, 2023

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 24, 2023

Going to push as commit 8367d28.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated label May 24, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this May 24, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 24, 2023

@MrSimms Pushed as commit 8367d28.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented May 24, 2023

Webrevs

@MrSimms MrSimms deleted the lworld_merge_jdk_21_14 branch April 15, 2024 09:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet