Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8304911: Use OperatingSystem enum in some modules #13335

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

RogerRiggs
Copy link
Contributor

@RogerRiggs RogerRiggs commented Apr 4, 2023

With the addition of jdk.internal.util.OperatingSystem references to the system property os.name can be replaced.
This PR exports jdk.internal.util to:

  • java.prefs,
  • java.security.jgss,
  • java.smartcardio,
  • jdk.charsets,
  • jdk.net,
  • jdk.zipfs

Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8304911: Use OperatingSystem enum in some modules

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/13335/head:pull/13335
$ git checkout pull/13335

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/13335
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/13335/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 13335

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 13335

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13335.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@RogerRiggs RogerRiggs marked this pull request as ready for review April 4, 2023 19:23
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Apr 4, 2023

👋 Welcome back rriggs! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title 8304911 8304911: Use OperatingSystem enum in some modules Apr 4, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Apr 4, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 4, 2023

@RogerRiggs The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs
  • i18n
  • net
  • nio
  • security

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added security security-dev@openjdk.org nio nio-dev@openjdk.org core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org net net-dev@openjdk.org i18n i18n-dev@openjdk.org labels Apr 4, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Apr 4, 2023

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@naotoj naotoj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 4, 2023

@RogerRiggs This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8304911: Use OperatingSystem enum in some modules

Reviewed-by: naoto, lancea, iris, jpai

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 63 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Apr 4, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@LanceAndersen LanceAndersen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The changes look good

Please add a Noreg-XXX label to the bug

Comment on lines 104 to 105
new String[]{StaticProperty.javaHome()
+ "\\bin\\sspi_bridge.dll"};
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
new String[]{StaticProperty.javaHome()
+ "\\bin\\sspi_bridge.dll"};
new String[]{ StaticProperty.javaHome()
+ "\\bin\\sspi_bridge.dll" };

case LINUX -> newInstance("jdk.net.LinuxSocketOptions");
case MACOS -> newInstance("jdk.net.MacOSXSocketOptions");
case WINDOWS -> newInstance("jdk.net.WindowsSocketOptions");
default -> new PlatformSocketOptions();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For another issue, but I assume this could be refactored to not need PlatformSocketOptions, in which case the mapping of OS name to implementation class would go away.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@RogerRiggs RogerRiggs Apr 5, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Created an issue to track the possible refactoring, will keep this change until then.
https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8305661

Reformatted expression to match switch expression formatting.
Copy link
Member

@jaikiran jaikiran left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks ok to me.

}
String platformFactory = switch (OperatingSystem.current()) {
case WINDOWS -> "java.util.prefs.WindowsPreferencesFactory";
case MACOS -> "java.util.prefs.MacOSXPreferencesFactory";
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
case MACOS -> "java.util.prefs.MacOSXPreferencesFactory";
case MACOS -> "java.util.prefs.MacOSXPreferencesFactory";

@RogerRiggs
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 10, 2023

Going to push as commit ba90dc7.
Since your change was applied there have been 74 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 76975da: 8305758: Update the JAR tool man page to indicate -i/--generate-file is deprecated
  • 0d45a52: 8302819: Remove JAR Index
  • 0243da2: 8305481: gtest is_first_C_frame failing on ARM
  • a8e3a2d: 8205129: Remove java.lang.Compiler
  • db174a1: 4825182: DefaultBoundedRangeModel.setMinimum() changes extent unnecessarily
  • 969a6b9: 8304825: MacOS metal pipeline - window isn't painted if created during display sleep
  • 9727685: 8305310: Calculate PublicKey from PrivateKey
  • 50d7335: 8305696: (zipfs) Avoid redundant LinkedHashMap.containsKey call ZipFileSystem.makeParentDirs
  • ec9d816: 6441827: Documentation mentions nonexistent NullReferenceException
  • 9e20382: 8305721: add make compile-commands artifacts to .gitignore
  • ... and 64 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/c6bd489cc8d30fb6eec865b3dab1cf861e25c8d7...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Apr 10, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Apr 10, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Apr 10, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 10, 2023

@RogerRiggs Pushed as commit ba90dc7.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@RogerRiggs RogerRiggs deleted the 8304911-use-os-enum branch December 11, 2023 17:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org i18n i18n-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated net net-dev@openjdk.org nio nio-dev@openjdk.org security security-dev@openjdk.org
8 participants