New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8304911: Use OperatingSystem enum in some modules #13335
Conversation
👋 Welcome back rriggs! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@RogerRiggs The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
@RogerRiggs This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 63 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The changes look good
Please add a Noreg-XXX label to the bug
new String[]{StaticProperty.javaHome() | ||
+ "\\bin\\sspi_bridge.dll"}; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
new String[]{StaticProperty.javaHome() | |
+ "\\bin\\sspi_bridge.dll"}; | |
new String[]{ StaticProperty.javaHome() | |
+ "\\bin\\sspi_bridge.dll" }; |
case LINUX -> newInstance("jdk.net.LinuxSocketOptions"); | ||
case MACOS -> newInstance("jdk.net.MacOSXSocketOptions"); | ||
case WINDOWS -> newInstance("jdk.net.WindowsSocketOptions"); | ||
default -> new PlatformSocketOptions(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For another issue, but I assume this could be refactored to not need PlatformSocketOptions, in which case the mapping of OS name to implementation class would go away.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Created an issue to track the possible refactoring, will keep this change until then.
https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8305661
Reformatted expression to match switch expression formatting.
src/java.security.jgss/share/classes/sun/security/jgss/wrapper/SunNativeProvider.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Fixup formatting.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks ok to me.
} | ||
String platformFactory = switch (OperatingSystem.current()) { | ||
case WINDOWS -> "java.util.prefs.WindowsPreferencesFactory"; | ||
case MACOS -> "java.util.prefs.MacOSXPreferencesFactory"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
case MACOS -> "java.util.prefs.MacOSXPreferencesFactory"; | |
case MACOS -> "java.util.prefs.MacOSXPreferencesFactory"; |
/integrate |
Going to push as commit ba90dc7.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@RogerRiggs Pushed as commit ba90dc7. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
With the addition of
jdk.internal.util.OperatingSystem
references to the system propertyos.name
can be replaced.This PR exports jdk.internal.util to:
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/13335/head:pull/13335
$ git checkout pull/13335
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/13335
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/13335/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 13335
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 13335
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13335.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment