Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8314730: GHA: Drop libfreetype6-dev transitional package in favor of libfreetype-dev #15378

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

shipilev
Copy link
Member

@shipilev shipilev commented Aug 22, 2023

Current GHA bootstraps fail for some arches with the incompatibility between libfreetype-dev and libfreetype6-dev. Current RISC-V GHA bootstrap fails due to this conflict.

In both sid, bullseye, jammy, libfreetype6-dev is a transitional package, the alias to libfreetype-dev:
https://packages.debian.org/bullseye/libfreetype6-dev
https://packages.debian.org/sid/libfreetype6-dev
https://packages.ubuntu.com/jammy/libfreetype6-dev

There is therefore no reason to ask for libfreetype6-dev instead of libfreetype-dev.

Additional testing:

  • GHA

Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8314730: GHA: Drop libfreetype6-dev transitional package in favor of libfreetype-dev (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/15378/head:pull/15378
$ git checkout pull/15378

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/15378
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/15378/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 15378

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 15378

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15378.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

Sorry, something went wrong.

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Aug 22, 2023

👋 Welcome back shade! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 22, 2023

@shipilev The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • build

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the build build-dev@openjdk.org label Aug 22, 2023
@shipilev shipilev marked this pull request as ready for review August 22, 2023 10:44
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Aug 22, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Aug 22, 2023

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@gnu-andrew gnu-andrew left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fix for the issue looks good and tests pass.

As to removing FreeType as a dependency altogether, I think you'd need to pass --with-freetype=bundled to the configure in build-cross-compile.yml as well. By default, it is set to system on Linux.
From make/autoconf/lib-freetype.m4:

  FREETYPE_TO_USE=bundled
  if test "x$OPENJDK_TARGET_OS" != "xwindows" && \
      test "x$OPENJDK_TARGET_OS" != "xmacosx" && \
      test "x$OPENJDK_TARGET_OS" != "xaix"; then
    FREETYPE_TO_USE=system
  fi

I did notice that this is set for the riscv64 build in make/conf/jib-profiles.js

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 22, 2023

@shipilev This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8314730: GHA: Drop libfreetype6-dev transitional package in favor of libfreetype-dev

Reviewed-by: andrew, erikj

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 8 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • f39fc0a: 8314738: Remove all occurrences of and support for @Revised
  • 6b9df03: 8311240: Eliminate usage of testcases.jar from TestMetaSpaceLog.java
  • 3e1b1bf: 8314688: VM build without C1 fails after JDK-8313372
  • 02ef859: 8313689: C2: compiler/c2/irTests/scalarReplacement/AllocationMergesTests.java fails intermittently with -XX:-TieredCompilation
  • ab86d23: 8250269: Replace ATTRIBUTE_ALIGNED with alignas
  • a66b5df: 8314618: RISC-V: -XX:MaxVectorSize does not work as expected
  • 87298d2: 8312535: MidiSystem.getSoundbank() throws unexpected SecurityException
  • 78f74bc: 8314672: ProblemList runtime/cds/appcds/customLoader/HelloCustom_JFR.java on linux-all and windows-x64

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Aug 22, 2023
@erikj79
Copy link
Member

erikj79 commented Aug 22, 2023

I did notice that this is set for the riscv64 build in make/conf/jib-profiles.js

This configuration only exists to verify that the build works. We don't currently use the binaries for anything. Using "bundled" made devkit creation and maintenance simpler.

For GHA, I think the builds should be configured the way we expect most users to configure them. On Linux, I think linking to a system installed freetype is more common and desired.

@shipilev
Copy link
Member Author

Integrating to unbreak GHA.

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 22, 2023

Going to push as commit 69d900d.
Since your change was applied there have been 8 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • f39fc0a: 8314738: Remove all occurrences of and support for @Revised
  • 6b9df03: 8311240: Eliminate usage of testcases.jar from TestMetaSpaceLog.java
  • 3e1b1bf: 8314688: VM build without C1 fails after JDK-8313372
  • 02ef859: 8313689: C2: compiler/c2/irTests/scalarReplacement/AllocationMergesTests.java fails intermittently with -XX:-TieredCompilation
  • ab86d23: 8250269: Replace ATTRIBUTE_ALIGNED with alignas
  • a66b5df: 8314618: RISC-V: -XX:MaxVectorSize does not work as expected
  • 87298d2: 8312535: MidiSystem.getSoundbank() throws unexpected SecurityException
  • 78f74bc: 8314672: ProblemList runtime/cds/appcds/customLoader/HelloCustom_JFR.java on linux-all and windows-x64

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Aug 22, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Aug 22, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Aug 22, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 22, 2023

@shipilev Pushed as commit 69d900d.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@gnu-andrew
Copy link
Member

I did notice that this is set for the riscv64 build in make/conf/jib-profiles.js

This configuration only exists to verify that the build works. We don't currently use the binaries for anything. Using "bundled" made devkit creation and maintenance simpler.

For GHA, I think the builds should be configured the way we expect most users to configure them. On Linux, I think linking to a system installed freetype is more common and desired.

I agree, though I have wondered in the past if we should have a build-only run that tests out the non-default options for these (mostly --with-x=system, freetype is the exception).

@shipilev shipilev deleted the JDK-8314730-gha-libfreetype branch August 24, 2023 17:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
build build-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants