Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8315413: Remove special filtering of Continuation.yield0 in StackWalker #15498

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

mlchung
Copy link
Member

@mlchung mlchung commented Aug 30, 2023

Loom added a special filtering of Continuation.yield0 in stack walker. After the initial implementation, JDK-8304919 marks the yielding and entering methods with @Hidden and hidden frames are filtered by stack walker by default. With @Hidden the special filtering should not be needed.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8315413: Remove special filtering of Continuation.yield0 in StackWalker (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/15498/head:pull/15498
$ git checkout pull/15498

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/15498
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/15498/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 15498

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 15498

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15498.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

Sorry, something went wrong.

Partially verified

This commit was created on GitHub.com and signed with GitHub’s verified signature. The key has expired.
We cannot verify signatures from co-authors, and some of the co-authors attributed to this commit require their commits to be signed.
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Aug 30, 2023

👋 Welcome back mchung! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Aug 30, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 30, 2023

@mlchung The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Aug 30, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Aug 30, 2023

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@AlanBateman AlanBateman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If tests are passing then this should be okay.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 31, 2023

@mlchung This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8315413: Remove special filtering of Continuation.yield0 in StackWalker

Reviewed-by: alanb

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 3 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 218829e: 8315421: [BACKOUT] 8314834 serviceability/jdwp/AllModulesCommandTest.java ignores VM flags
  • 3c8a667: 8314611: Provide more explicative error message parsing Currencies
  • df5e6e5: 8315248: AssertionError in Name.compareTo

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Aug 31, 2023
@mlchung
Copy link
Member Author

mlchung commented Aug 31, 2023

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 31, 2023

Going to push as commit c8acab1.
Since your change was applied there have been 11 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • ea5aa61: 8315383: jlink SystemModulesPlugin incorrectly parses the options
  • 29ff1e4: 8315445: 8314748 causes crashes in x64 builds
  • 145d8bc: 8315051: jdk/jfr/jvm/TestGetEventWriter.java fails with non-JVMCI GCs
  • 486fa08: 8313873: java/nio/channels/DatagramChannel/SendReceiveMaxSize.java fails on AIX due to small default RCVBUF size and different IPv6 Header interpretation
  • b0353ad: 8315242: G1: Fix -Wconversion warnings around GCDrainStackTargetSize
  • b594f01: 8314748: 1-10% regressions on Crypto micros
  • 39f1813: 8315318: Typo in comment on sun.nio.ch.Net.unblock4
  • 47aa6f3: 8315219: G1: Improve allocator pathological case where it keeps doing direct allocations instead of retiring a PLAB
  • 218829e: 8315421: [BACKOUT] 8314834 serviceability/jdwp/AllModulesCommandTest.java ignores VM flags
  • 3c8a667: 8314611: Provide more explicative error message parsing Currencies
  • ... and 1 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/3eac8905aee6edecbebcc12a41300d3ce176fbff...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Aug 31, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Aug 31, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Aug 31, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 31, 2023

@mlchung Pushed as commit c8acab1.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@mlchung mlchung deleted the JDK-8315413 branch October 4, 2023 21:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants