Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

JDK-8317866: replace NET_SocketAvailable #16139

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

MBaesken
Copy link
Member

@MBaesken MBaesken commented Oct 11, 2023

When doing JDK-8317603, it became clear that NET_SocketAvailable should be replaced.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8317866: replace NET_SocketAvailable (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/16139/head:pull/16139
$ git checkout pull/16139

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/16139
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/16139/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 16139

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 16139

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16139.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

Sorry, something went wrong.

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Oct 11, 2023

👋 Welcome back mbaesken! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Oct 11, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 11, 2023

@MBaesken The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • net
  • nio

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added nio nio-dev@openjdk.org net net-dev@openjdk.org labels Oct 11, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Oct 11, 2023

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@dfuch dfuch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks reasonable. Thanks for the cleanup!
Let me run some test before approving.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 11, 2023

@MBaesken This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8317866: replace NET_SocketAvailable

Reviewed-by: dfuchs, alanb

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 6 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 2d46b29: 8317874: Add @sealedGraph to StringTemplate.Processor.Linkage
  • 8f8c45b: 8315716: RISC-V: implement ChaCha20 intrinsic
  • 8a9c4d5: 8317675: Serial: Move gc/shared/generation to serial folder
  • bcafec5: 8316958: Add test for unstructured locking
  • 731fb4e: 8317797: G1: Remove unimplemented predict_will_fit
  • 7976151: 8313438: [s390x] build broken after JDK-8301996

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Oct 11, 2023
@MBaesken
Copy link
Member Author

Hi Daniel and Alan, thanks for the reviews !

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 12, 2023

Going to push as commit 424de29.
Since your change was applied there have been 15 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 6d6c900: 8038244: (fs) Check return value of malloc in Java_sun_nio_fs_AixNativeDispatcher_getmntctl()
  • eca6ea4: 8317873: Add @sealedGraph to IllegalFormatException
  • 2edf9c3: 8317763: Follow-up to AVX512 intrinsics for Arrays.sort() PR
  • 839cb19: 8317581: [s390x] Multiple test failure with LockingMode=2
  • 387896f: 8309621: [XWayland][Screencast] screen capture failure with sun.java2d.uiScale other than 1
  • 8d2ad2b: 8317977: update problemlist to include MacOS for sun/security/tools/keytool/NssTest.java
  • b92de54: 8317964: java/awt/Mouse/MouseModifiersUnitTest/MouseModifiersUnitTest_Standard.java fails on macosx-all after JDK-8317751
  • 2a80160: 8314283: Support for NSS tests on aarch64 platforms
  • 3f6d016: 8314896: additional clarifications to reversed() default methods' implementation requirements
  • 2d46b29: 8317874: Add @sealedGraph to StringTemplate.Processor.Linkage
  • ... and 5 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/ca96fd3b07958a7de6274bd945490bb9e79c2170...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Oct 12, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Oct 12, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Oct 12, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 12, 2023

@MBaesken Pushed as commit 424de29.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
integrated Pull request has been integrated net net-dev@openjdk.org nio nio-dev@openjdk.org
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants