-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8321216: SerialGC attempts to access the card table beyond the end of the heap during card table scan #16968
Conversation
👋 Welcome back tschatzl! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
03f1561
to
4b7fbac
Compare
4b7fbac
to
68dcf92
Compare
/contributor add @albertnetymk |
@tschatzl |
@tschatzl This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 4 new commits pushed to the
Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
Thanks @albertnetymk @walulyai for your reviews. /integrate |
Going to push as commit 800f347.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
Hi all,
please review this fix to
CardTableRS::find_first_clean_card
where when iterating through the object at the very end of the heap Serial GC accesses the card table beyond the allocated memory, which fails with an assert.The fix is to allow retrieving addresses for cards beyond the card table using a special
addr_for_raw
method.In discussions with @albertnetymk , the initial version to add a check whether the current scan cursor is already at or beyond the end of the area to find clean cards for using an extra, somewhat superfluous parameter has been rejected as a bit confusing (the first commit).
Testing: failing test case, gha
Thanks,
Thomas
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Contributors
<ayang@openjdk.org>
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/16968/head:pull/16968
$ git checkout pull/16968
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/16968
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/16968/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 16968
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 16968
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/16968.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment