Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8341793: Fix ExceptionOccurred in jdk.accessibility #21979

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

bourgesl
Copy link
Contributor

@bourgesl bourgesl commented Nov 8, 2024

Use ExceptionCheck instead


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8341793: Fix ExceptionOccurred in jdk.accessibility (Sub-task - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/21979/head:pull/21979
$ git checkout pull/21979

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/21979
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/21979/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 21979

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 21979

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21979.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

Sorry, something went wrong.

Use ExceptionCheck instead
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Nov 8, 2024

👋 Welcome back lbourges! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 8, 2024

@bourgesl This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8341793: Fix ExceptionOccurred in jdk.accessibility

Reviewed-by: prr, avu

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 222 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 69c9f25: 8344061: Remove doPrivileged calls from shared implementation code in the java.desktop module : part 2
  • 3328b4e: 8343700: ceil_log2 should not loop endlessly
  • 6a5256e: 8344149: Remove usage of Security Manager from java.rmi
  • 0b1f571: 8253440: serviceability/sa/TestJhsdbJstackLineNumbers.java failed with "Didn't find enough line numbers"
  • 93e889b: 8342449: reimplement: JDK-8327114 Attach in Linux may have wrong behavior when pid == ns_pid
  • bb7a840: 8342541: Exclude List/KeyEventsTest/KeyEventsTest.java from running on macOS
  • 087a07b: 8343479: Remove unnecessary @SuppressWarnings annotations (hotspot)
  • 02ec8ca: 8342508: Use latch in BasicMenuUI/bug4983388.java instead of delay
  • 47ebf8d: 8342098: Write a test to compare the images
  • 78602be: 8344024: Unnecessary Hashtable usage in RSAPSSSignature.DIGEST_LENGTHS
  • ... and 212 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/7d6a2f3740bf42652bdf05bb922d1f2b2ae60d6a...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title JDK-8341793: Fix ExceptionOccurred in jdk.accessibility 8341793: Fix ExceptionOccurred in jdk.accessibility Nov 8, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Nov 8, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 8, 2024

@bourgesl The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • client

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the client client-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Nov 8, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Nov 8, 2024

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@avu avu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Removed declaration of useless variable 'exception'
@openjdk openjdk bot removed the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Nov 16, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Nov 16, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Nov 18, 2024
@bourgesl
Copy link
Contributor Author

@prrace
Copy link
Contributor

prrace commented Nov 18, 2024

I will check windows build failure: https://github.com/bourgesl/jdk-official/actions/runs/11882209379/job/33107442693#step:10:1

D'oh. I missed that. this is C++. But you added the env arg.
Are you not building this locally ? Seems not.
If you have a windows-specific fix it is a good idea to have windows available.

Copy link
Contributor

@prrace prrace left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

you need to remove the env arg.

@openjdk openjdk bot removed the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Nov 18, 2024
@bourgesl
Copy link
Contributor Author

I will check windows build failure:
https://github.com/bourgesl/jdk-official/actions/runs/11882209379/job/33107442693#step:10:1

Thanks, I am using my macbook pro but can use another laptop to build & run windows ...
Will check on this dell 7670 windows 10.

@bourgesl
Copy link
Contributor Author

@prrace build is ok. Approved ?

@bourgesl bourgesl requested a review from prrace November 19, 2024 06:11
@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Nov 19, 2024
@bourgesl
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 19, 2024

Going to push as commit aac1f9a.
Since your change was applied there have been 223 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • cd45ba3: 8342041: Test gc/shenandoah/oom/TestClassLoaderLeak.java slow on Windows after JDK-8340490
  • 69c9f25: 8344061: Remove doPrivileged calls from shared implementation code in the java.desktop module : part 2
  • 3328b4e: 8343700: ceil_log2 should not loop endlessly
  • 6a5256e: 8344149: Remove usage of Security Manager from java.rmi
  • 0b1f571: 8253440: serviceability/sa/TestJhsdbJstackLineNumbers.java failed with "Didn't find enough line numbers"
  • 93e889b: 8342449: reimplement: JDK-8327114 Attach in Linux may have wrong behavior when pid == ns_pid
  • bb7a840: 8342541: Exclude List/KeyEventsTest/KeyEventsTest.java from running on macOS
  • 087a07b: 8343479: Remove unnecessary @SuppressWarnings annotations (hotspot)
  • 02ec8ca: 8342508: Use latch in BasicMenuUI/bug4983388.java instead of delay
  • 47ebf8d: 8342098: Write a test to compare the images
  • ... and 213 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/7d6a2f3740bf42652bdf05bb922d1f2b2ae60d6a...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Nov 19, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Nov 19, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Nov 19, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 19, 2024

@bourgesl Pushed as commit aac1f9a.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
client client-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants