8343004: Adjust JAXP limits

[JoeWang-Java]

Adjust JAXP Limits. Limits are adjusted as specified in the CSR.

Tests:
Updated the config test with the new settings.

 Removed obsolete tests Bug6309988.java and Bug4674384_MAX_OCCURS_Test.java, and files used by these tests. These tests verified legacy properties. They came into the JDK from the JAXP and SJSXP standalone libraries. Improvements were made before the integration into the JDK via for example, SJSXP Issue 30. Though the issue tracker is no longer accessible, the tests, e.g. IssueTracker30, are in the JAXP test suite.

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue
• Change requires CSR request JDK-8343006 to be approved

Issues

• JDK-8343004: Adjust JAXP limits (Enhancement - P4)
• JDK-8343006: Adjust JAXP limits (CSR)

Reviewers

• Lance Andersen (@LanceAndersen - Reviewer)
• Roger Riggs (@RogerRiggs - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/22337/head:pull/22337
$ git checkout pull/22337

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/22337
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/22337/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 22337

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 22337

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22337.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back joehw! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@JoeWang-Java This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8343004: Adjust JAXP limits

Reviewed-by: lancea, rriggs

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 70 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• 9458a43: 8318416: Superscript marks should use consistent font style
• c5de307: 8344992: Remove Security Manager dependencies from java.security.cert API and implementations
• 65c98e5: 8344420: Remove Security Manager dependencies from javax.security package
• 2465526: 8344821: Test CheckDefaultArchiveFile.java fails if classes_coh.jsa is not present
• d752f19: 8343427: Class file load hook crashes on archived classes from multi-release JARs
• f1b5a6e: 8344565: SM cleanup in jdk/internal and java/lang package private classes
• d8a2337: 8344895: SM cleanup of module java.xml
• c329f97: 8345015: Remove unused method lookup_time_t_function
• 86d527f: 8344949: javax.security.auth.Subject.SecureSet.writeObject does not do a security check anymore
• f0b72f7: 8342380: Implement JEP 498: Warn upon Use of Memory-Access Methods in sun.misc.Unsafe
• ... and 60 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/21e0fb8648d61f041a04d44ad6c46fc5efd86261...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

[openjdk]

@JoeWang-Java The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 01: Full - Incremental (f2e7bb6f)
• 00: Full (50cf34d7)

[LanceAndersen]

Hi Joe,

The changes look good overall

[RogerRiggs]

Looks fine

[RogerRiggs]

This test would be easier to maintain if the Properties were defined as an enum, each with its related values.

[JoeWang-Java]

Will look into that. Added to JDK-8344999.

[seanjmullan]

Is it necessary to have both a default and secure value anymore? All the values are the same for both AFACT.

[JoeWang-Java]

I'll start a discussion as related to the JEP, whether to keep FSP as the approach has changed. For now, the values for enableExtensionFunctions are still different. If there's a conclusion, I can make the change via that PR.

[JoeWang-Java]

/integrate

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit 28c8729.
Since your change was applied there have been 77 commits pushed to the master branch:

• 8c2b4f6: 8345057: ML_KEM NamedParameterSpec constants removed by ML-DSA integration
• 8389e24: 8345058: Javac issues different error messages for the modifiers of the requires directive
• 8da6435: 8343693: [JVMCI] Override ModifiersProvider.isConcrete in ResolvedJavaType to be isArray() || !isAbstract()
• 7ae6069: 8344184: Remove sun.net.ResourceManager after JEP 486 integration
• 1d5587b: 8344256: Clean up obsolete code in java.desktop/share/classes/sun/awt/datatransfer/DataTransferer.java
• 5e15415: 8344654: Some client tests still expect a SecurityManager after JEP486
• 3689f39: 8344013: "bad tag in log" assert with +LogCompilation +CITimeVerbose
• 9458a43: 8318416: Superscript marks should use consistent font style
• c5de307: 8344992: Remove Security Manager dependencies from java.security.cert API and implementations
• 65c98e5: 8344420: Remove Security Manager dependencies from javax.security package
• ... and 67 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/21e0fb8648d61f041a04d44ad6c46fc5efd86261...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@JoeWang-Java Pushed as commit 28c8729.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.