Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8348029: Make gtest death tests work with real crash signals #23191

Conversation

tstuefe
Copy link
Member

@tstuefe tstuefe commented Jan 18, 2025

Small change adds a new macro to the gtest TEST macro zoo: TEST_VM_CRASH_SIGNAL. This one is a companion to TEST_VM_FATAL_ERROR_MSG and TEST_VM_ASSERT_MSG and allows to write gtest that test expected crashes to happen. I will need that for a regression test for https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8330174 , among other things.

You use it like this:

TEST_VM_CRASH_SIGNAL(Testtest, test, "SIGSEGV") {
  ... do something that you expect should result in a specific crash ...
}

Note that the string provided is platform dependent (signal names on Posix, SEH names on Windows).


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8348029: Make gtest death tests work with real crash signals (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23191/head:pull/23191
$ git checkout pull/23191

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/23191
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23191/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 23191

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 23191

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23191.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

Sorry, something went wrong.

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jan 18, 2025

👋 Welcome back stuefe! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 18, 2025

@tstuefe This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8348029: Make gtest death tests work with real crash signals

Reviewed-by: mbaesken, szaldana

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 19 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • c33c1cf: 8347909: Automatic precompiled.hpp inclusion
  • f54e0bf: 8345766: C2 should emit macro nodes for ModF/ModD instead of calls during parsing
  • 0f426e4: 8343685: C2 SuperWord: refactor VPointer with MemPointer
  • 6b91985: 8346157: [Ubsan]: runtime error: pointer index expression with base 0x000000001000 overflowed to 0xfffffffffffffff0
  • 955bf18: 8348040: Bad use of ifdef with INCLUDE_xxx GC macros
  • ca863fd: 8347758: modules.cpp leaks string returned from get_numbered_property_as_sorted_string()
  • 3a4d5ff: 8347996: JavaCompilation.gmk should not include ZipArchive.gmk
  • 0fbf10a: 8348038: Docs build failing in Options.notifyListeners with AssertionError
  • 9346984: 8347916: Simplify javax.swing.text.html.CSS.LengthUnit.getValue
  • 3c92392: 8348089: Serial: Remove virtual specifier in SerialHeap
  • ... and 9 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/0ff67000dc22e8c58e8a9ed1379010f4a2ad7666...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title JDK-8348029: Make gtest death tests work with real crash signals 8348029: Make gtest death tests work with real crash signals Jan 18, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 18, 2025

@tstuefe The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org label Jan 18, 2025
@tstuefe tstuefe force-pushed the JDK-8348029-Gtest-death-tests-dont-work-for-real-signals branch from 25aed8f to 8babf78 Compare January 19, 2025 07:50

Partially verified

This commit was created on GitHub.com and signed with GitHub’s verified signature. The key has expired.
We cannot verify signatures from co-authors, and some of the co-authors attributed to this commit require their commits to be signed.
@tstuefe tstuefe force-pushed the JDK-8348029-Gtest-death-tests-dont-work-for-real-signals branch from 8babf78 to 93b880d Compare January 19, 2025 07:51
@tstuefe tstuefe marked this pull request as ready for review January 19, 2025 07:51
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jan 19, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jan 19, 2025

Webrevs

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jan 21, 2025
Copy link
Member

@SoniaZaldana SoniaZaldana left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am not a Reviewer but this looks good to me. Also very useful! Thanks @tstuefe.

@tstuefe
Copy link
Member Author

tstuefe commented Jan 21, 2025

Thanks @MBaesken and @SoniaZaldana

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 21, 2025

Going to push as commit 48c7597.
Since your change was applied there have been 20 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 4a9fba6: 8347990: Remove SIZE_FORMAT macros and replace remaining uses
  • c33c1cf: 8347909: Automatic precompiled.hpp inclusion
  • f54e0bf: 8345766: C2 should emit macro nodes for ModF/ModD instead of calls during parsing
  • 0f426e4: 8343685: C2 SuperWord: refactor VPointer with MemPointer
  • 6b91985: 8346157: [Ubsan]: runtime error: pointer index expression with base 0x000000001000 overflowed to 0xfffffffffffffff0
  • 955bf18: 8348040: Bad use of ifdef with INCLUDE_xxx GC macros
  • ca863fd: 8347758: modules.cpp leaks string returned from get_numbered_property_as_sorted_string()
  • 3a4d5ff: 8347996: JavaCompilation.gmk should not include ZipArchive.gmk
  • 0fbf10a: 8348038: Docs build failing in Options.notifyListeners with AssertionError
  • 9346984: 8347916: Simplify javax.swing.text.html.CSS.LengthUnit.getValue
  • ... and 10 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/0ff67000dc22e8c58e8a9ed1379010f4a2ad7666...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jan 21, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jan 21, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jan 21, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 21, 2025

@tstuefe Pushed as commit 48c7597.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants