Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8349501: Relocate supporting classes in security/testlibrary to test/lib/jdk tree #23531

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

jnimeh
Copy link
Member

@jnimeh jnimeh commented Feb 8, 2025

This takes a few test classes and moves them away from their current location in test/jdk/java/security/testlibrary to test/lib/jdk/test/lib/security, grouping them together with many other existing test utility classes. It also changes the dependent security tests to point at the new locations for these classes, as needed.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8349501: Relocate supporting classes in security/testlibrary to test/lib/jdk tree (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23531/head:pull/23531
$ git checkout pull/23531

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/23531
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23531/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 23531

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 23531

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23531.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

Sorry, something went wrong.

…lib/jdk tree
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Feb 8, 2025

👋 Welcome back jnimeh! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 8, 2025

@jnimeh This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8349501: Relocate supporting classes in security/testlibrary to test/lib/jdk tree

Reviewed-by: rhalade, weijun

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 103 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • ab66c82: 8349639: jfr/event/gc/detailed/TestShenandoahEvacuationInformationEvent.java fails to compile after JDK-8348610
  • f74c4df: 8349580: Do not use address in MemTracker top level functions
  • c9cadbd: 8346567: Make Class.getModifiers() non-native
  • 5589892: 8343074: test/jdk/com/sun/net/httpserver/docs/test1/largefile.txt could be generated
  • d104deb: 8349556: RISC-V: improve the performance when -COH and -AvoidUnalignedAccesses for UL and LU string comparison
  • 4a83ca1: 8349666: RISC-V: enable superwords tests for vector reductions
  • 8f6ccde: 8349554: [UBSAN] os::attempt_reserve_memory_between reported applying non-zero offset to non-null pointer produced null pointer
  • 7d52f1e: 8349525: RBTree: provide leftmost, rightmost, and a simple way to print trees
  • e9278de: 8348411: C2: Remove the control input of LoadKlassNode and LoadNKlassNode
  • 5395ffa: 8327378: XMLStreamReader throws EOFException instead of XMLStreamException
  • ... and 93 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/d589a82d08a01ae6ff87103b58d286f3c14367e5...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 8, 2025

@jnimeh The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • security

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the security security-dev@openjdk.org label Feb 8, 2025
@jnimeh jnimeh marked this pull request as ready for review February 8, 2025 16:26
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Feb 8, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Feb 8, 2025

Webrevs

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Feb 8, 2025
Copy link
Member

@rhalade rhalade left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Following 4 tests also need to be updated:
open/test/jdk/sun/security/tools/keytool/NssTest.java open/test/jdk/sun/security/pkcs11/ec/TestECDSA2.java open/test/jdk/sun/security/pkcs11/ec/TestECDH2.java open/test/jdk/java/security/Provider/GetServiceRace.java

@openjdk openjdk bot removed the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Feb 9, 2025
Copy link
Member

@rhalade rhalade left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the updates! LGTM

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Feb 10, 2025
@jnimeh
Copy link
Member Author

jnimeh commented Feb 10, 2025

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 10, 2025

Going to push as commit b737f7f.
Since your change was applied there have been 104 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 84b32cb: 8349178: runtime/jni/atExit/TestAtExit.java should be supported on static JDK
  • ab66c82: 8349639: jfr/event/gc/detailed/TestShenandoahEvacuationInformationEvent.java fails to compile after JDK-8348610
  • f74c4df: 8349580: Do not use address in MemTracker top level functions
  • c9cadbd: 8346567: Make Class.getModifiers() non-native
  • 5589892: 8343074: test/jdk/com/sun/net/httpserver/docs/test1/largefile.txt could be generated
  • d104deb: 8349556: RISC-V: improve the performance when -COH and -AvoidUnalignedAccesses for UL and LU string comparison
  • 4a83ca1: 8349666: RISC-V: enable superwords tests for vector reductions
  • 8f6ccde: 8349554: [UBSAN] os::attempt_reserve_memory_between reported applying non-zero offset to non-null pointer produced null pointer
  • 7d52f1e: 8349525: RBTree: provide leftmost, rightmost, and a simple way to print trees
  • e9278de: 8348411: C2: Remove the control input of LoadKlassNode and LoadNKlassNode
  • ... and 94 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/d589a82d08a01ae6ff87103b58d286f3c14367e5...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Feb 10, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Feb 10, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Feb 10, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 10, 2025

@jnimeh Pushed as commit b737f7f.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@jnimeh jnimeh deleted the JDK-8349501 branch February 24, 2025 04:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
integrated Pull request has been integrated security security-dev@openjdk.org
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants