-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8345298: RISC-V: Add riscv backend for Float16 operations - scalar #23844
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
👋 Welcome back mli! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@Hamlin-Li This change is no longer ready for integration - check the PR body for details. |
@Hamlin-Li this pull request can not be integrated into git checkout float16-scalar
git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git master
git merge FETCH_HEAD
# resolve conflicts and follow the instructions given by git merge
git commit -m "Merge master"
git push |
@Hamlin-Li The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi, Thanks for working on this part. Some initial comments after a cursory look.
BTW, I just removed TestFloat16VectorConvChain test for riscv temporariely, as with this patch the ConvF2HF(AddF(ConvHF2F, ConvHF2F)) will be replaced by a ReinterpretHF2S(AddHF(ReinterpretS2HF, ReinterpretS2HF)). In the short future, when we support vectorization of float16 operations, we can enable the test, but for riscv it will still be different form of Nodes, could be something like VectorReinterpretHF2S(VectorAddHF(VectorReinterpretS2HF, VectorReinterpretS2HF)). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Several more comments after a closer look.
Maybe we should also update the |
No, as this test is for "vector conversion chain", only support of |
That makes sense to me. Thanks. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the update. There minor comments remain. Seems fine to me otherwise.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Overall LGTM. Thanks for the updates.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Still good to me.
Thank you! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems alright, thanks!
Hi,
Can you help to review this patch?
It's an implementation of #22754 on riscv.
Performance
data
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23844/head:pull/23844
$ git checkout pull/23844
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/23844
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23844/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 23844
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 23844
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23844.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment