New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8303279: C2: crash in SubTypeCheckNode::sub() at IGVN split if #1580
Conversation
👋 Welcome back btaylor! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit. |
@benty-amzn This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 39 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@simonis) but any other Committer may sponsor as well. ➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good.
Thanks for downporting!
What is wrong with the GHA tests? |
The failed test |
/integrate |
@benty-amzn |
/sponsor |
Going to push as commit baf2841.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@simonis @benty-amzn Pushed as commit baf2841. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Backport is nearly clean, because https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8275201 has not been backported.
Only context lines in
src/hotspot/share/opto/subtypenode.cpp
differ, the assert itself is unmodified.Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/1580/head:pull/1580
$ git checkout pull/1580
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/1580
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/1580/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 1580
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 1580
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/1580.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment