-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 37
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8315875: GenShen: Remove heap mode check from ShenandoahInitLogger #320
8315875: GenShen: Remove heap mode check from ShenandoahInitLogger #320
Conversation
👋 Welcome back wkemper! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
|
||
ShenandoahHeap* heap = ShenandoahHeap::heap(); | ||
log_info(gc, init)("Mode: %s", heap->mode()->name()); | ||
log_info(gc, init)("Heuristics: %s", heap->global_generation()->heuristics()->name()); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Note - we still reference the global_generation
abstraction in this file and we won't have that upstream. I wonder if we should push that abstraction back into ShenandoahHeap
so that this code in ShenandoahInitLogger
could call ShenandoahHeap::heuristics
directly, with an implementation like:
ShenandoahHeuristics* ShenandoahHeap::heuristics() {
return global_generation()->heuristics();
}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah. Your proposed change might make the abstraction a bit cleaner.
Webrevs
|
|
||
ShenandoahHeap* heap = ShenandoahHeap::heap(); | ||
log_info(gc, init)("Mode: %s", heap->mode()->name()); | ||
log_info(gc, init)("Heuristics: %s", heap->global_generation()->heuristics()->name()); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah. Your proposed change might make the abstraction a bit cleaner.
@earthling-amzn This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 88 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks okay.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
perfect, thank you!
/integrate |
Going to push as commit 69aa971.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@earthling-amzn Pushed as commit 69aa971. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
There are some additional improvements to the init logger that should be easy to upstream.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/shenandoah.git pull/320/head:pull/320
$ git checkout pull/320
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/320
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/shenandoah.git pull/320/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 320
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 320
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/shenandoah/pull/320.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment