Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8315875: GenShen: Remove heap mode check from ShenandoahInitLogger #320

Closed

Conversation

earthling-amzn
Copy link
Contributor

@earthling-amzn earthling-amzn commented Sep 7, 2023

There are some additional improvements to the init logger that should be easy to upstream.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Committer)

Issue

  • JDK-8315875: GenShen: Remove heap mode check from ShenandoahInitLogger (Task - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/shenandoah.git pull/320/head:pull/320
$ git checkout pull/320

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/320
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/shenandoah.git pull/320/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 320

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 320

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/shenandoah/pull/320.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

Sorry, something went wrong.

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Sep 7, 2023

👋 Welcome back wkemper! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Sep 7, 2023

ShenandoahHeap* heap = ShenandoahHeap::heap();
log_info(gc, init)("Mode: %s", heap->mode()->name());
log_info(gc, init)("Heuristics: %s", heap->global_generation()->heuristics()->name());
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note - we still reference the global_generation abstraction in this file and we won't have that upstream. I wonder if we should push that abstraction back into ShenandoahHeap so that this code in ShenandoahInitLogger could call ShenandoahHeap::heuristics directly, with an implementation like:

ShenandoahHeuristics* ShenandoahHeap::heuristics() {
  return global_generation()->heuristics();
}

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah. Your proposed change might make the abstraction a bit cleaner.

@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Sep 7, 2023

Webrevs


ShenandoahHeap* heap = ShenandoahHeap::heap();
log_info(gc, init)("Mode: %s", heap->mode()->name());
log_info(gc, init)("Heuristics: %s", heap->global_generation()->heuristics()->name());
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah. Your proposed change might make the abstraction a bit cleaner.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 7, 2023

@earthling-amzn This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8315875: GenShen: Remove heap mode check from ShenandoahInitLogger

Reviewed-by: kdnilsen, shade, ysr

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 88 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 496addb: Merge
  • 024133b: 8311964: Some jtreg tests failing on x86 with error 'unrecognized VM options' (C2 flags)
  • 62a953f: 8315689: G1: Remove unused init_hash_seed
  • cfc1489: 8315579: SPARC64 builds are broken after JDK-8304913
  • f6c203e: 8314949: linux PPC64 Big Endian: Implementation of Foreign Function & Memory API
  • a01b3fb: 8288660: JavaDoc should be more helpful if it doesn't recognize a tag
  • ba1a463: 8315377: C2: assert(u->find_out_with(Op_AddP) == nullptr) failed: more than 2 chained AddP nodes?
  • a258fc4: 8315648: Add test for JDK-8309979 changes
  • 5d3fdc1: 8315612: RISC-V: intrinsic for unsignedMultiplyHigh
  • 5cbff24: 8315406: [REDO] serviceability/jdwp/AllModulesCommandTest.java ignores VM flags
  • ... and 78 more: https://git.openjdk.org/shenandoah/compare/33a8085e044b8a2dfdc909211945a83d89c04afd...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Sep 7, 2023
Copy link
Member

@shipilev shipilev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks okay.

Copy link
Member

@ysramakrishna ysramakrishna left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

perfect, thank you!

@earthling-amzn
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 8, 2023

Going to push as commit 69aa971.
Since your change was applied there have been 88 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 496addb: Merge
  • 024133b: 8311964: Some jtreg tests failing on x86 with error 'unrecognized VM options' (C2 flags)
  • 62a953f: 8315689: G1: Remove unused init_hash_seed
  • cfc1489: 8315579: SPARC64 builds are broken after JDK-8304913
  • f6c203e: 8314949: linux PPC64 Big Endian: Implementation of Foreign Function & Memory API
  • a01b3fb: 8288660: JavaDoc should be more helpful if it doesn't recognize a tag
  • ba1a463: 8315377: C2: assert(u->find_out_with(Op_AddP) == nullptr) failed: more than 2 chained AddP nodes?
  • a258fc4: 8315648: Add test for JDK-8309979 changes
  • 5d3fdc1: 8315612: RISC-V: intrinsic for unsignedMultiplyHigh
  • 5cbff24: 8315406: [REDO] serviceability/jdwp/AllModulesCommandTest.java ignores VM flags
  • ... and 78 more: https://git.openjdk.org/shenandoah/compare/33a8085e044b8a2dfdc909211945a83d89c04afd...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Sep 8, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Sep 8, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Sep 8, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 8, 2023

@earthling-amzn Pushed as commit 69aa971.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@earthling-amzn earthling-amzn deleted the isolate-shenandoah-heap branch September 22, 2023 20:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants