-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 108
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8334546: [lworld] C2: Calling clone() on non-allocated inline types fails with "Should have been buffered" #1149
Conversation
…ails with "Should have been buffered"
👋 Welcome back chagedorn! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@chhagedorn This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 8 new commits pushed to the
Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@TobiHartmann) but any other Committer may sponsor as well. ➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me!
Thanks Tobias for your review! /integrate |
@chhagedorn |
/sponsor |
Going to push as commit 09014c7.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@TobiHartmann @chhagedorn Pushed as commit 09014c7. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
We are currently not handling inline types in the
clone()
instrinsic because it was not possible for a value class to implementCloneable
. This changed with JDK-8332243. A value class now trivially returns the inline type because it has no identity. We need to do the same in the C2 intrinsic forclone()
when we have an inline type (currently, we are hitting an assert later).Thanks,
Christian
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla.git pull/1149/head:pull/1149
$ git checkout pull/1149
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/1149
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla.git pull/1149/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 1149
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 1149
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/1149.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment